ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1721|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全11-6

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-10-18 14:08:00 | 只看该作者

大全11-6

F: We ought not to test the safety of new drugs on sentient animals, such as dogs and rabbits. Our benefit means their pain, and they are equal to us in the capacity to feel pain.

G: We must carry out such tests; otherwise, we would irresponsibly sacrifice the human lives that could have been saved by the drugs.

Which of the following, if true, is the best objection that could be made from F’s point of view to counter G’s point?

(A) Even though it is not necessary for people to use cosmetics, cosmetics are also being tested on sentient animals.

(B) Medical science already has at its disposal a great number of drugs and other treatments for serious illnesses.

(C) It is not possible to obtain scientifically adequate results by testing drugs in the test tube, without making tests on living tissue.

(D) Some of the drugs to be tested would save human beings from great pain.E

(E) Many tests now performed on sentient animals can be performed equally well on fertilized chicken eggs that are at a very early stage of development.

为什么A不对?

沙发
发表于 2006-10-18 14:20:00 | 只看该作者

答案应该支持F的话,即拿动物做实验没有必要

A 我想是这样的:

A说:it is not necessary for people to use cosmetics,不是每个人都必要,也就是说还有人是有必要的,因此还得拿动物来试验啊。不能支持F所说的

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-10-18 15:17:00 | 只看该作者

好吧

你的解释我很赞同

不过还是感觉这道题目有点怪怪的

地板
发表于 2009-1-26 12:28:00 | 只看该作者

A是out of scope吧,本题讨论的是drugs,和cosmetics没有关系


[此贴子已经被作者于2009-3-31 16:49:35编辑过]
5#
发表于 2010-5-11 17:50:45 | 只看该作者

A是out of scope吧,本题讨论的是drugs,和cosmetics没有关系

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-3-31 16:49:35编辑过]

-- by 会员 flyuo2006 (2009/1/26 12:28:00)



说道我心坎里去了
6#
发表于 2010-5-11 18:26:06 | 只看该作者
记得当初这题我也错了。。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-8 12:08
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部