101. (31700-!-item-!-188;#058&006145) (GWD 3-Q38/prep 2-6 different type)

jacob · 发表于 2010-1-30 20:37:02

答案C,想不明白为什么啊？

请帮忙分析下，谢谢了！！！

Two computer companies, Garnet and Renco, each pay Salcor to provide health insurance for their employees. Because early treatment of high cholesterol can prevent strokes that would otherwise occur several years later, Salcor encourages Garnet employees to have their cholesterol levels tested and to obtain early treatment for high cholesterol. Renco employees generally remain with Renco only for a few years, however. Therefore, Salcor lacks any financial incentive to provide similar encouragement to Renco employees.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Early treatment of high cholesterol does not eliminate the possibility of a stroke later in life.

B. People often obtain early treatment for high cholesterol on their own.

C. Garnet hires a significant number of former employees of Renco.

D. Renco and Garnet have approximately the same number of employees.

E. Renco employees are not, on average, significantly younger than Garnet employees.

prayer · 发表于 2010-1-31 12:44:49

给你一道一模一样的变体题，分析一下，你自己就明白了。
Which of the following most logically completes the passage?
Garnet and RenCo each provide health care for their employees. Garnet pays for both testing of its employees’ cholesterol levels and treatment of high cholesterol. This policy saves Garnet money, since high cholesterol left untreated for many years leads to conditions that require very expensive treatment. However, RenCo dose not have the same financial incentive to adopt such a policy, because ______.
A. early treatment of high cholesterol dose not entirely eliminate the possibility of a stroke later in life

B. the mass media regularly feature stories encouraging people to maintain diets that are low in cholesterol

C. RenCo has significantly more employees than Garnet has

D. RenCo’s employees are unlikely to have higher cholesterol levels than Garnet’s employees

E. the average length of time an employee stays with RenCo is less than it is with Garnet

OA

SPOILER: E 。
E, on the other hand, goes along very well with "since high cholesterol left untreated for many years leads to conditions". This implies that people are more likely to stay employed with Garnet. And this ensures that the early treatment is more beneficial in terms of finance involved. RenCo does not enjoy this advantage because people stay for a shorter period of time (E).

jacob · 发表于 2010-1-31 13:12:10

谢谢楼上的
你那个题我能理解
但是我那个就转不过弯儿啊。
G雇佣C的人怎么就能说明，S对C没吸引力是错的呢？
是说S先在C治好了C员工的高血脂，等他们去了G就不用治疗了，是这样吗？
请指正谢谢

prayer · 发表于 2010-1-31 16:28:14

谢谢楼上的
你那个题我能理解
但是我那个就转不过弯儿啊。
G雇佣C的人怎么就能说明，S对C没吸引力是错的呢？
是说S先在C治好了C员工的高血脂，等他们去了G就不用治疗了，是这样吗？
请指正谢谢

-- by 会员 jacob (2010/1/31 13:12:10)

Salcor lacks any financial incentive to provide similar encouragement to Renco employees.

没有经济动机，缺乏吸引力，因为C公司还是会把他的员工给挖走的。

prep的这道题没有我给你的那道题说的清晰明白，我的那道题也是没有经济动机，因为不管你做不做那个东东，反正员工在这里工作的年限都一样。

francoiswang · 发表于 2010-1-31 16:55:51

如果G所雇佣的R以前的员工，在R的时候没做过测试没有早期治疗，而是到了G以后才发病，那么S保险公司就要付一大笔钱。所以鼓励R员工去做测试接受治疗还是有经济动因的，在R就治疗好，再雇佣到G，就不会因为在R没有治疗而到了再G发中风而赔钱了。

101. (31700-!-item-!-188;#058&006145) (GWD 3-Q38/prep 2-6 different type)

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块