gwd-6-14

Q14:

Political Advertisement:

Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership.  Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office.  So there can be no question that throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the advertisement?

1. The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure.


2. Average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.


3. Some of the jobs created in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure have in the meantime been eliminated again.


4. The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide.


5. The average pay for jobs in the city is currently higher than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city.

答案是C, 偶选D. 哪个对? 请指教! 谢谢...

你已经先假设” 取消的工作也比平均工资高”，所以﹙D﹚会support。

若假设另一个方向” 取消的工作也比平均工资低”，那﹙D﹚不就是weaken了..

相反的，﹙C﹚提供了另一个不可或缺的因素。

故我认为应该是﹙C﹚

本题是借助文中提及的第三者达到加强的目的,D为正确答案;

M-N-L, 通过M与N, N与L的比较,给出M/L之间的关系;

嗯，怎么没有人问 gwd 6－15？

为什么选e，哪位nn给指点一下？

试着解释爱维的疑问。如果取消的工资比现在低，则现在的平均工资更高，因此是加强；如果取消的工资比现在高，则有可能是削弱，因为这样现在的平均工资就可能降低，D所以就正确。不知我说的对不对？

请问A为什么不行?