gwd-6-14

clelia

ding~~

anybody could help??

tuzq

以下是引用爱维的天在2004-12-2 15:04:00的发言：

你已经先假设” 取消的工作也比平均工资高”，所以﹙D﹚会support。

若假设另一个方向” 取消的工作也比平均工资低”，那﹙D﹚不就是weaken了..

相反的，﹙C﹚提供了另一个不可或缺的因素。

故我认为应该是﹙C﹚

D正确。文章中已经说了，新增工作比平均工作工资高。D说失去的工作和平均工作工资一样。不就说明新增工作比失去的工作工资高了吗？为什么还要假设” 取消的工作也比平均工资低”呢？

tuzq

以下是引用clelia在2005-1-14 14:30:00的发言：

请问A为什么不行?

Q14:
Political Advertisement:
Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership.  Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office.  So there can be no question that throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the advertisement?

A.      The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure.

我觉得A也有道理。题干的结论是：throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger

The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure.

A正好说明pay是稳步上升的－－不关是比前任上升，而是在任期内逐步上升。

请指教！

agape0417

Although i choice A that seems a correct answer, finally i realize D will be better

D fill out the gap between "more jobs created than were eliminated" and "the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide"

gre3333

题干给出两点支持：1。the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, 2。the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office.

第二点说明了几年来平均工资逐年提高。A只提到了工资的提高，单纯重复了第二点的一部分。跟D比较，A不如D好。

lawyer_1

A是将市长D的成绩和其后来的比，而原文是和其前期的比。注意A的意思earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure。是拿过去三年和更早（比过去三年早）的市长D的任期比。所以无关

nybanana

D说明的情况是：即使是取消了的工作，其平均工资亦没有比现在的低，说明该市长在任期间，工资水平没有下降，从而加强，因而D是正确的，这样的理解应该可以讲得过去。

Semmy

支持D,关于A:

原文：市长D任期时每年新增的工作的平均工资 高于 D任期时候每年全市工作的平均工资

A（就算past three year都在市长D的任期内，则A相当于在说）：市长D任期时每年新增工作的平均工资  高于 市长D任期前新增工作的平均工资

1, 由于D任期前的新增工作 也属于 D任期时候的工作的一部分，对于这部分的任何判断都是被原文中的全市平均工资限制死了的，不论D任期前新增工作的工资高低，它们仍然被包括进了D任期时的平均工资的计算。不论高低都可以满足（D任期时候每年全市工作的平均工资 低于 市长D任期时每年新增的工作的平均工资）。

2,A可以算作原文内容的一个补充，但是对原文的内容不起support或者weaken作用，是无关选项。

jackychew

楼上的解释有深度，虽然没全看懂，但觉得够到位了，考试时有这些判断感觉想必足够了，要不然时间不允许我的说。

evelyndream

支持D

Lawyer解釋的非常清楚!

讚!