ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 604|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]8月JJ的一个AA

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-8-24 13:15:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]8月JJ的一个AA

2、An argument from the head of HR dept. in an automobile company:  
Study shows that employees of not-for-profit organizations, compared to those of for-profit organizations, are more likely to perform well when their performance is not monitored and evaluated. Interviews with employees of not-for-profit organizations also show that they have more motivation. They believe that their work is important to improve the society. They have personal reasons to perform well, even without financial returns. Therefore, our corporation should donate a significant portion of the overall profit to humanity, to increase the motivation and productivity of the employees, and thus to increase the profit.

不知道是我理解问题还是怎样……这个公司是说要给人道主义的组织捐钱?以提高自己员工的动机和生产效率?进而提高利润?
这个逻辑……好像也太离谱了吧……给not-for-profit organization捐钱,与自己的员工totally没关系啊。。。不知道我读题读错没有……
谢谢!
沙发
发表于 2009-8-24 13:22:00 | 只看该作者
我也想问,这题是什么思路啊
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-24 14:10:00 | 只看该作者
顶一下……
感觉跟别的题差太多了……不知道是不是对题目的理解问题。。。
呼唤NN~~~and 战友~~~~
地板
发表于 2009-8-24 14:34:00 | 只看该作者

这个题目的思路是一个典型的false analogy。其它问题也有很多。

1.攻击study和interview的代表性。

2.攻击false analogy

3.攻击recommendations的充分有效性

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-5 12:58
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部