ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1910|回复: 16
打印 上一主题 下一主题

1月16日,上海早场二战 数学机经在回复里面

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-1-17 11:20:00 | 只看该作者

1月16日,上海早场二战 数学机经在回复里面

 一战620, 二战成绩还是不理想, 才660. 看来GWD的题不做两遍是不行的.

感觉这个月的语法比较难, 和prep以及GWD的都不一样.

哎, 算了, 现在也不打算再考了,660也够学校的分数线了.

还是非常感谢谢CDers的帮助, 写下少许机经,回报CD论坛!

语文部分:

我语文不太好,能记下的JJ也不多.

记得阅读考到了机经里提到的三篇: 一篇firm size与innovation之间的关系,

一篇连锁书店,考到一个题,问文章中的材料最能反对哪一项. 有说小书店有特色,所以可以避免竞争, 有说连锁店如果也搞特色,就可以竞争过当地的小书店.五个选项我看了半天,觉得好像没答案......后来选不记得了,反正不是这两项.

第三篇是prescriptive grammar and descriptive grammar之间的关系.不过从我语文成绩来看,这好像不是高分区的题目! 第一段说了两个grammar之间的定义,第二段与机经里提到的差不多, 第三段给了1a, 1b, 2a, 2b,  四个例子. 第四段好像又提到某某人的看法.有一道题目问最后一段的作用. 我选了有conclusive的那一项.

又想起一道题,主要是第三段的细节,题目为从文章中1a, 1b, 2a, 2b,中推出什么. 我认为只要提到了grammar uncorrect的选项都为错.因为文章中明确说了不能这样提说法.

还有一篇是说传统观点认为,家用电器发展了, 家庭妇女做家务的时间减少了. 不过跳出来两个人, 反对此观点. 好像 是GWD上的阅读,请机经整理的同学再确认一下. 题目和文章都不难.

补充作文!!

AA: 去年, 市场中对mining的需求下降, 某公司股价什么的都下降了.公司认为应该把研究从mining技术转向新能源, 因为过去搞新能源的公司都成功了.

反驳: 去年不代表今年; 别的公司成功, 不代表你这个公司能成功; 这个公司的科学家以前不是做新能源的, 他们能在这个领域 有突破吗?

AI: Many people compain 我们越来越depend on computers, 但是, computers正在不断使我们的生活变得更好.


[此贴子已经被作者于2009-1-17 12:32:59编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2009-1-17 11:29:00 | 只看该作者

 The idea that equipping homes
with electrical appliances and other “modern” household technologies would
eliminate drudgery, save labor time, and increase leisure for women who were
full-time home workers remained largely unchallenged until the women’s movement
of the 1970’s spawned the groundbreaking and influential works of sociologist
Joann Vanek and historian Ruth Cowan. Vanek analyzed 40 years of time- use
surveys conducted by home economists to argue that electrical appliances and
other modern household technologies reduced the effort required to perform
specific tasks, but ownership of these appliances did not correlate with less
time spent on housework by full-time home workers. In fact, time spent by these workers remained remarkably constant― at about 52 to 54 hours per
week― from the 1920’s
to the 1960’s, a period of
significant change in household technology.
  In surveying two centuries of household
technology in the United States, Cowan argued that the “industrialization” of
the home often resulted in more work for full-time home workers because the use
of such devices as coal stoves, water pumps, and vacuum cleaners tended to
reduce the workload of married-women’s helpers (husbands, sons, daughters, and
servants) while promoting a more rigorous standard of housework.  The full-time home worker’s duties also
shifted to include more household management, child care, and the post-Second
World War phenomenon of being “Mom’s taxi.”

板凳
发表于 2009-1-17 11:31:00 | 只看该作者

The idea that equipping homes           以前观点:家电让妇女脱离杂

       with electrical appliances and other          役,节约劳动时间。

       “modern” household technologies

Line       would eliminate drudgery, save labor

  (5)      time, and increase leisure for women

who were full-time home workers

remained largely unchallenged until       1970’s的妇女运动导致一项

the women’s movement of the 1970’s      研究,发现电器让某些差事不

spawned the groundbreaking and          那么费劲,但并不能减少全职

 (10)      influential works of sociologist Joann     家庭成员的工作时间。

Vanek and historian Ruth Cowan.

Vanek analyzed 40 years of time-

use surveys conducted by home

economists to argue that electrical

 (15)      appliances and other modern house-

hold technologies reduced the effort

required to perform specific tasks,

but ownership of these appliances did

not correlate with less time spent on

 (20)      housework by full-time home workers.

       In fact, time spent by these workers

       remained remarkably constant―at           (数据支持)

about 52 to 54 hours per week―from

the 1920’s to the 1960’s, a period

 (25)      of significant change in household

technology.  In surveying two

centuries of household technology

in the United States, Cowan argued

that the “industrialization” of the home

 (30)      often resulted in more work for full-time

home workers because the use of

such devices as coal stoves, water

       pumps, and vacuum cleaners tended

to reduce the workload of married-

 (35)     women’s helpers (husbands, sons,

daughters, and servants) while           电器反而更使家务活的标准更

promoting a more rigorous standard       严格。

of housework.  The full-time home      全职家务转而包含更多管理,儿

worker’s duties also shifted to include     童照顾,二战后更出现“妈妈的

 (40)      more household management, child      士“的现象。

care, and the post-Second World War

phenomenon of being “Mom’s taxi.”

大意就是说家用电器的使用没有减少家庭妇女的劳动时间

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q3:

According to the passage, which of the following is true about the idea mentioned in line 1?

             

  1. It has been undermined by data found in time-use surveys conducted by home economists.

  2. It was based on a definition of housework that was explicitly rejected by Vanek and Cowan.
  3. It is more valid for the time period studied by Cowan than for the time period studied by Vanek.
  4. It is based on an underestimation of the time that married women spent on housework prior to the industrialization of the household.
  5. It inaccurately suggested that new household technologies would reduce the effort required to perform housework.

40 years of time-use surveys conducted by home
            
economists to argue that electrical
            
appliances and other modern house-hold technologies reduced the effort
            
required to perform specific tasks,
            
but ownership of these appliances did

not correlate with less time spent on
            
housework by full-time home workers.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q4:

The passage is primarily concerned with

             

  1. analyzing a debate between two scholars
  2. challenging the evidence on which a new theory is based
  3. describing how certain scholars’ work countered a prevailing view

  4. presenting the research used to support a traditional theory
  5. evaluating the methodology used to study a particular issue

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q5:

Which of the following best describes the function of the sentence in lines 21-26 (“In fact, time … in household technology”)?

             

  1. It offers an alternative interpretation of a phenomenon described in the previous sentence (lines 12-20).
  2. It provides the specific evidence on which an argument described in the previous sentence (lines 12-20) is based.

  3. It shifts the focus of the argument developed earlier in the passage.
  4. It introduces evidence that has not been taken into account by Vanek and Cowan.
  5. It introduces a topic for discussion that will be developed in the rest of the passage.

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

QX:

The passage suggests that Vanek and Cowan would agree that modernizing household technology did not

 

  1. reduce the workload of servants and other household helpers
  2. raise the standard of housework that women who were full-time home workers set for themselves
  3. decrease the effort required to perform household tasks
  4. reduce the time spent on housework by women who were full-time home workers

  5. result in a savings of money used for household maintenance
地板
发表于 2009-1-17 11:31:00 | 只看该作者
我认为第二篇阅读难不难决定了是不是高分。
5#
发表于 2009-1-17 11:32:00 | 只看该作者
楼主,拜托确认下题目!!
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-1-17 11:47:00 | 只看该作者

我两次数学都考了51,感觉数学还是很有把握, 机经里面也一些错误.

这次的数学主要难在数论部分, 与原来难在集合概率上有区别.大家注意.

先提些记得的题目,机经上有的不再提了

(1)三角形三边X<Y<Z,问此三角是不是直角三角型
   

1. X^2+Y^2=3^2+4^2
   

2. Y^2+Z^2=4^2+5^2  选E

(2)PS题.说有三个公司, 给了三张表, 分别是1990, 1992, 1996年的产量(或者revenue)之类的,不记得了.然后问他们的产量和年份三点连线,哪个公司三个点在一条直线上.

很容易, 用直线两点公式算斜率即可. 选第三个公司. 其它两个都不在一条直线上.

(3)机经里有争议的题129. ,不过这个题的题目并不如机经中所写的.

一个公司员工工资中数是35000,一共127人,问下面哪个对

   1at least 63 人大于或等于35000

   2at least 63 人小于35000

  3at most 63 人大于或等于35000  

答案为只有1对. 2错在如果所有人都是35000,则不满足.

   1at least 63 人大于或等于35000

   2at least 63 人小于35000

  3at most 63 人大于或等于35000  

答案为只有1对. 2错在如果所有人都是35000,则不满足.

   (4)一道烂题,也是我数学最后一道.

玩一个游戏,140个什么东西平均分给m个人, 每个人得到的不少于2,问m的可能值.

选项中有5和10, 妈的, 都可以嘛. 我还是选了10.因为能被十整除的肯定可以被五整除.

(5)小螃蟹机经中137题, 题目不对

c, c^2, c^3........c^n. c和n均为大于1的整数,问数列和是否为even

 (1)c为奇数

 (2):n为奇数.

答案为C

答案为C

答案为C

(6)一道老题.

一个大圆里面有个小圆, 小圆半径为h,大圆为k. 小圆面积为大圆一半,问半径之比.

选根号2, A

(7)三个集合ABC, A中23456, B中012345, C中123456, 问A并B交C的集.

选1234那一项.

(8)小螃蟹44DS)两条直线KL,都不过原点。问他们垂直吗?

 

 

 

1:应该意思是说,两条直线的x-intercept绝结值一样.不过具体怎么说的忘记了

22直线的y-intercept都等于kx-intercept

答案C,

(9)两条直线都过(1,-1)点且垂直,其中A直线与X轴的交点为(3,0),求B直线与Y轴的交点

(10)机经中题有问题

n为大于一的整数,问n是否为质数

a). n为某个自然数m的最小因子(不包括1)

b). n只有1和n两个因子

答案为D.

只记得这么多了.

大家千万注意, 不要背机经的答案,因为你考试的时候,这些题极有可能很像, 但是有少许地方发生改动.

我就碰到了几道这样的题.

祝大家考试顺利


[此贴子已经被作者于2009-1-17 11:58:53编辑过]
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-1-17 11:49:00 | 只看该作者

是这篇家庭妇女的文章,不过题目都不一样.

这么快就有这么多回复啦, 呵呵, 我才把数学写完了.

我数学写出来的都很有把握, 自己对数学还是很有自信的

8#
发表于 2009-1-17 11:59:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用urakee在2009-1-17 11:49:00的发言:

是这篇家庭妇女的文章,不过题目都不一样.

这么快就有这么多回复啦, 呵呵, 我才把数学写完了.

我数学写出来的都很有把握, 自己对数学还是很有自信的

楼主能回忆起来阅读题目不??

9#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-1-17 12:04:00 | 只看该作者

实在没什么印象了.

有一个题与

Q4:

The passage is primarily concerned with

             

  1. analyzing a debate between two scholars
            
  2. challenging the evidence on which a new theory is based
            
  3. describing how certain scholars’ work countered a prevailing view

  4. presenting the research used to support a traditional theory
            
  5. evaluating the methodology used to study a particular issue

有点像, 也是问文章结构.

选项写法不一样,但都是选反驳老观点.

10#
发表于 2009-1-17 12:05:00 | 只看该作者

小女子跪求选校,在线等~~

以下是引用urakee在2009-1-17 12:04:00的发言:

实在没什么印象了.

有一个题与

Q4:

The passage is primarily concerned with

             

  1. analyzing a debate between two scholars
      
  2. challenging the evidence on which a new theory is based
      
  3. describing how certain scholars’ work countered a prevailing view

  4. presenting the research used to support a traditional theory
      
  5. evaluating the methodology used to study a particular issue

有点像, 也是问文章结构.

选项写法不一样,但都是选反驳老观点.

谢啦,楼主辛苦了

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-17 11:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部