- UID
- 1338881
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2018-4-19
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
我剛考砸了邏輯，當練習分析一下。感覺A到D的考點在句子指涉的範圍／程度。
「史學上其中一個最令人煩惱的問題是：要在時序相互矛盾的訊息中，敲定某事件發生的日期。歷史學家會先盡量減少參考資料的數量，例如篩去可信度性較低的資料來源。到餘下幾項資料後，歷史學家可能會嘗試獨立地、在不參考資料的情況下確定哪個日期為正確的（儘管有時會不成功）。 」
A. We have no plausible chronology of most of the events for which attempts have been made by historians to determine the right date.
＞應該不是絕大部份的事件也有這樣的情況 。
B. Some of the events for which there are conflicting chronologies and for which attempts have been made by historians to determine the right date cannot be dated reliably by historians.
＞正確，有些是不能確切推定的。
C. Attaching a reliable date to any event requires [determining which of several conflicting chronologies is most likely to be true].
＞推日子不一定要疏理矛盾時序的，不是所有事件也有矛盾出現。
D. Determining independently of the usual sources which of several conflicting chronologies is more likely to be right is an ineffective way of dating events. ＞「though on occasion unsuccessfully」而已，整體還是可行的（成功應該多於失敗）
E. The soundest approach to dating an event for which the usual sources give conflicting chronologies is to undermine the credibility of as many of these sources as possible.
＞「篩去資料愈多，結果愈可信」，沒人說過。
|
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2018-11-18 21:10:30
收藏
收藏
楼主