ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer's argument?

正确答案: D

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 10468|回复: 22
打印 上一主题 下一主题

各位大神 跪求 OG12版 CR 114题详解 万分感谢!!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-5-31 13:14:09 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
如题,跪求 OG12版 CR 114题详解 万分感谢!!!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-6-1 10:25:54 | 只看该作者
建议你把题目贴上来,方便大家帮助
板凳
发表于 2011-6-4 19:01:41 | 只看该作者
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930
the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters
working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have
worked on hotels built subsequently.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?
(A) The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in
other structures, such as houses and stores.
(B) Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.
(C) The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not signifi cantly different in quality from
the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.
(D) The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and
be demolished.
(E) The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined signifi cantly since 1930.
地板
发表于 2011-6-4 19:12:45 | 只看该作者
选D 哪里不明白
1930前的烂木工活都塌了,他现在找到的只有质量好的。
5#
发表于 2011-6-4 20:19:24 | 只看该作者
那么不就证明1930年前的做功好吗?D是加强啊,不是削弱啊。
6#
发表于 2011-6-4 22:57:44 | 只看该作者
题目说的是这个人全国旅行然后发现1930前建的房子都很好,然后得出结论1930前工人普遍在做工技术方面胜过以后的工人。

D选项说质量越好的房子越不容易毁坏,也就是说能从1930留到现在的房子都是质量最好的,那么作者用这些当时质量最好的房子和现在的普通房子比自然就是不成立的,因为这些质量最好的房子不能代表1930前得所有普通房子,因此削弱

怕说的不清楚,再举个例子,比如说吕布肯定比宋朝的一个小将领厉害,这是必然的,但是你不能因此得出结论说整个三国时期的武将都比宋朝的厉害,这样的比较是不成立的
7#
发表于 2011-6-4 23:48:17 | 只看该作者
他没找到烂活,不代表没有烂活啊。。。
8#
发表于 2011-7-17 17:11:40 | 只看该作者
弱弱的问:
D选项 可以理解成他因削弱玛?老房子能留下来不一定是因为木工匠手艺好,有可能是因为木材质量好呢?
9#
发表于 2011-7-17 17:15:36 | 只看该作者
但camole777 和 Thruth 的意思是因为旧房子没有代表性,所以新旧根本没法比。好像更有道理哦。
10#
发表于 2011-7-21 21:57:29 | 只看该作者
谢谢大神!终于明白了~!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 04:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部