ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1874|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD2-Q35

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-7-29 01:04:00 | 只看该作者

GWD2-Q35

请问下GWD(TN)2-Q35:

Historians who study European women of the Renaissance try to measure “independence,” “options,” and other indicators of the degree to which the expression of women’s individuality was either permitted or suppressed. Influenced by Western individualism, these historians define a peculiar form of personhood:  an innately bounded unit, autonomous and standing apart from both nature and society.  An anthropologist, however, would contend that a person can be conceived in ways other than as an “individual.”  In many societies a person’s identity is not intrinsically unique and self-contained but instead is defined within a complex web of social relationships. 

In her study of the fifteenth-century Florentine widow Alessandra Strozzi, a historian who specializes in European women of the Renaissance attributes individual intention and authorship of actions to her subject.  This historian assumes that Alessandra had goals and interests different from those of her sons, yet much of the historian’s own research reveals that Alessandra acted primarily as a champion of her sons’ interests, taking their goals as her own.  Thus Alessandra conforms more closely to the anthropologist’s notion that personal motivation is embedded in a social context.  Indeed, one could argue that Alessandra did not distinguish her personhood from that of her sons.  In Renaissance Europe the boundaries of the conceptual self were not always firm and closed and did not necessarily coincide with the boundaries of the bodily self.

 

Q35:The passage suggests that the historian mentioned in the second paragraph would be most likely to agree with which of the following assertions regarding Alessandra Strozzi?

A.    Alessandra was able to act more independently than most women of her time because she was a widow.

B.    Alessandra was aware that her personal motivation was embedded in a social context.

C.    Alessandra had goals and interests similar to those of many other widows in her society.

D.    Alessandra is an example of a Renaissance woman who expressed her individuality through independent action.

E.     Alessandra was exceptional because she was able to effect changes in the social constraints placed upon women in her society.

答案D。实在不明白。请nn帮忙分析下这道题好吗?3Q!

沙发
发表于 2009-7-29 01:20:00 | 只看该作者
首先,我绝对不是NN哈,呵呵。
我做的时候也晕了一下。我也不知道你是哪没看懂,反正你要把握作者态度。第一段,作者说历史学家认为在R时代,女人的行为是独立的,HOWEVER之后又说,anthropologist的观点是认为R时代的女人的行为是不独立的,社会化的。第二段,一个历史学家引用 Alessandra的例子是想说明独立,但是实际情况是这个例子反而恰恰说明了她的行为是社会化的。题目问,历史学家会同意哪个看法,显然是D啦。ABCE完全胡扯
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-7-29 04:22:00 | 只看该作者
恩,谢谢楼上小小牛的分析:)我同意你对作者态度的分析。最后的结论是Alessandra的行为是社会化的,但是D表达的是A是独立的。是不是因为这道题问的是第二段中historian的观点而并非问作者的观点呢?historian认为A独立而作者说这个historian的研究恰恰揭示了A不独立。是不是应该这样理解呢?这样看来第二段提到的historian自己并没有意识到自己研究揭示了相反的结果吗?请多多指教:)
地板
发表于 2009-7-29 22:40:00 | 只看该作者
呵呵是的,就是这样理解!
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-7-30 00:17:00 | 只看该作者

明白了,呵呵,谢谢指教:)

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-14 09:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部