- UID
- 2853
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2003-4-23
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
LSAT-27-2-22
27-II-22(A)
It is absurd idea that whatever artistic endeavor the government refuses to support it does not allow, as one can see by rephrasing the statement to read: No one is allowed to create art without a government subsidy.
The pattern of reasoning in which one of the following is most similar to that in the argument above?
(A) The claim that any driver who is not arrested does not break the law is absurd, as one can see by rewording it: Every driver who breaks the law gets arrested.
(B) The claim that any driver who is not arrested does mot break the law is absurd, as one can see by rewording it: Every driver who gets arrested has broken the law.
有点困惑，原文中the government refuses to support it does not allow的逻辑关系看是refuses to support是必要条件，即：如果不承认，就不支持；而rephrase的是：如果承认，就支持
上述推论若正确的话，答案应该是B而不是A。
|
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2003-9-24 05:21:00
