ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2194|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-4-14 不明白了

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-8-26 23:56:49 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Q2: GWD-4-14???????????????????????????
Guidebookwriter:  I have visited hotels throughoutthe country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of theoriginal carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels builtafterward.  Clearly carpenters working onhotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort thancarpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.

Which of thefollowing, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?

A.   The quality of original carpentry in hotelsis generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in otherstructures, such as houses and stores.
B.    Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodatemore guests than those built before 1930.
C.   The materials available to carpentersworking before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from thematerials available to carpenters working after 1930.
D.   The better the quality of originalcarpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuseand be demolished.
E.    The average length of apprenticeship forcarpenters has declined significantly since 1930.


我选b, 答案选d,为什么啊。。没信心了


   
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-8-27 00:17:21 | 只看该作者
D项为文中现象找个他因来削弱,房子没倒不是因为原来的人技术高,而是因为D选项说的凡是能留下的老房都是质量好的,而那些质量不好的可能早就disuse了,这就削弱了原文。B选项没关系阿,不能说新房好来证明老房不好
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-8-27 00:32:39 | 只看该作者
谢谢楼上的大哥指教!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-11 14:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部