ChaseDream
搜索
123456
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: luciole
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG-12-102题,这答案真是太牵强了!求人指点!

[复制链接]
51#
发表于 2018-9-24 15:22:29 | 只看该作者
RichardVeritas 发表于 2017-9-21 01:43
诚实地说,我看到D时就觉得它完全对了。题目看起来是有点困惑,我试着总结一下思路:

题目问:

您说的这点我很受启发,只有当注意到why it is saying 的时候才能真正的开始思考逻辑推理。以前都是泛泛的阅读,感受不到深入的逻辑链!
52#
发表于 2020-5-16 22:22:18 | 只看该作者
Step one of the Kaplan method tells us to read the question stem, and then to determine the kind of question that it is. The question stem:

“The considerations given best serve as part of an argument that”
Okay, so there are considerations given (by the author) leading up to an argument. The “considerations given” is evidence, and the question wants us to determine the author’s main point, or conclusion. We call this type of question a “main point” question.
Step two is to analyze the stimulus: Normally, we identify a conclusion by looking for words like “thus, therefore, hence, etc.” .... BUT, in a main point question, we actually don’t want to be attracted by those kind of words-they are put there by the test-maker because they know you will naturally be attracted to them in a main point question.
Instead, in a main point question, the author’s main point will often be signalled by a contrast keyword such as “but,” “however,” “while,” or, “although.”

In the passage of this question, we learn of the director’s claim in the second sentence. The director’s claim is that their reproduction of the play is a lot like the original play. The next sentence starts with the word “although.” Here, the function of “although” is to dismiss potential counter-evidence against the director’s claim: the fact that the actor is like 20th century Groucho Marx could be used against the director’s claim (that the reproduction is a faithful representation of the original 16th century version.)

So from the word “although,” and using some critical reasoning, we can determine that the author’s intent in arguing is to defend the director’s claim against evidence that could go against it (against the director’s claim).
Step three of the method is to make a prediction of the right answer. Say to yourself: “The author is defending the director. The author’s main point is that the director’s claim is correct.”

Step four is to aggressively scan for a match to the prediction. Because we spent so much time generating the prediction, and because we don’t care about wrong answers and why they are wrong, we scan for a choice that matches our insight.

Then, choice D is correct.

53#
发表于 2020-7-10 15:14:09 | 只看该作者
其实这道题的重点不是16世纪的风格和18世纪的不一样,而是old和modern的差别,所以只要演员的风格是old school的话,就不影响导演的claim
而且注意题目里的although,让步,重点其实是主句的“和16世纪的差不多”
54#
发表于 2020-7-24 09:44:19 | 只看该作者
这道CR题难在读懂Question,时间紧凑的时候没有问号误以为这是一个找assumption题目。其实是inference推断题,根据题目提供的considerations能够server给的五个option中的哪一个。有的书介绍这种为main point题目。LS也提到了,解法是找题目中有关键逻辑转折的部分包括although, but等等。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-28 06:12
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部