ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1324|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[逻辑小分队] 求助 BoldFace 疑惑

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2016-10-26 10:56:18 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
A double-blind study, in which neither the patient nor the primary researcher knows whether
the patient is being given the drug being tested or a placebo, is the most effective procedure for
testing the efficacy of a drug.       But we will not be able to perform such a study on this new drug,
since the drug will have various effects on the patients’ bodies, which will make us aware of
whether the patients are getting the drug or a placebo.
The two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
(A) The first is a general consideration that introduces the argument; the second is a special
situation that weighs against the first.

(B) The first is a general principle that is necessary for this argument; the second is an
anti-consideration that the argument includes.
(C) The first is a premise that this argument includes; the second is a main idea that can be drawn
from this argument.
(D) The first is an evidence that this argument includes; the second is a conclusion that can not be
drawn from this argument.
(E) The first is a general situation that supports this argument; the second is a conclusion that can
be drawn from a special fact.

来源:http://forum.chasedream.com/thread-12769-1-1.html

由于这道题全部被“黑脸”了,我才开始觉得argument可能不是题干中的某句话了,,,
求问各位大牛~~BoldFace题型中,选项中的argument到底指的是什么~~感谢~


收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2016-10-26 13:10:32 | 只看该作者
argument大概有两种可能。

一是“we should implement double-blind studies in the testing of efficacy of all new drugs",大概这个argument应该放在两句话之间。

所以原文的大意就是:double blind study好;那么所有药物测试都应该用;但是这个药用不了。这个结构结构下E比较对。

二是"double blind studies cannot be implemented in all testing of efficacy of new drugs“,大概这个argument应该放在最后。

所以原文的大意就是:double blind study好;但是这个药用不了;看来double blind study不能够用于所有新药测试。这个结构下A比较对。

我更倾向于第一种。因为看起来文章着重要考虑的是某一种药是否可以用double blind study,而不是给double blind study的普遍适用性下一个结论。另外,从答案A的写法看,似乎argument应该在第二句之前就已经被introduce了,所以第二种argument的位置和答案A有冲突。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2016-10-26 19:32:00 | 只看该作者
Bradz 发表于 2016-10-26 13:10
argument大概有两种可能。

一是“we should implement double-blind studies in the testing of efficacy  ...

本来开始以为argument是整个题干了,,看来还是不是呀,,谢谢啦~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-5 04:50
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部