We have many choices when we decide to buy a clothing（a piece of clothes） or wear it. The reason why we choose this one rather than that one（this one貌似要有对象指代，是否可以改为a particular piece of clothes好点） is related to our preference. I agree that in the most times, the way a person dressed is a reflection of his or her personality, but there are few（如果是支持观点，那么but改为although好点，如果是反对观点么few改为 a few或some好点）exceptions. To make the issue clear, firstly we need to category the different situations. In the working place, when the company or the industrial standard requires you to have a certain dress, how can you refuse to take the cloth on（建议改为abide by this instruction or requirement）. For example, the lawyers have to wear suit and tie in the court. Can you imagine a male lawyer who wears causal cloth and earring when seriously argue with someone. Of course, you will say this is absurd and ridiculous. The same is true of waiter, banker, public servant and so on. In this circumstance, what you need to do is to obey, otherwise you may lose your job. So（貌似so 在这里是个连词，不是副词，不能独立成句，这里是个断句，So可以改为therefore,hence这些副词可以独立成句） the way a person dressed totally has no correlation with his or her own style.
这个例子挺好的
In other situations, I agree with this argument that the personality can be seen on this small daily activity. If we do not like the style of the cloth, we probably will not buy it. So (同样的问题)the choosing process shows your thought and characters. Take one famous dancer in China YangLiping as an example（take A as an example应该是个祈使句，所以后面可以用逗号，不能直接跟一个句子）, although she is a celebrity with a（不定冠词a貌似可以去掉） considerable income, she never put money on some luxurious clothing. She is fascinated by the exotic clothes, some of which are presented a certain culture with religious meaning and some of which are printed the scene of the nature. From the way she dressed, we can certainly get some information about her personality.
In addition, some people may argue that nowadays many people are flow（这个用法我不是很看明白） the fashion. So the dress has no reference to people's true opinions. However, i would like to say following the crowd is just a reflection of their personalities. Not all people like to follow the smart clothes which are changeable every year（感觉这样修饰有点不简洁直接为smart changeable clothes好点）,（加连词because） they have their own life pace and style. The people who afraid they are old-fashioned implicate they like to be the same with others.(不是很看懂改句啊) Perhaps they do not know what they truly want and have little confidence on themselves.
As the reason I listed above, when(whether) the way a person dressed is an indication of his or her personality is depend on different situations whether he or she can truly express himself/herself. As the position required, the clothes is nothing (not correlation) with the personality while other circumstances the way is definitely a good reference to a person's character.
We have many choices when we decide to buy a clothing（a piece of clothes） or wear it. The reason why we choose this one rather than that one（this one貌似要有对象指代，是否可以改为a particular piece of clothes好点）我在想，one是泛指，可不可以指代前面那个a piece of clothes ？is related to our preference. I agree that in the most times, the way a person dressed is a reflection of his or her personality, but there are few（如果是支持观点，那么but改为although好点，如果是反对观点么few改为 a few或some好点）（其实这是我第一次写两边倒分情况的文章，不知全文表达清楚没，这样的话but是不是就可以了）exceptions. To make the issue clear, firstly we need to category the different situations. In the working place, when the company or the industrial standard requires you to have a certain dress, how can you refuse to take the cloth on（建议改为abide by this instruction or requirement）. For example, the lawyers have to wear suit and tie in the court. Can you imagine a male lawyer who wears causal cloth and earring when seriously argue with someone. Of course, you will say this is absurd and ridiculous. The same is true of waiter, banker, public servant and so on. In this circumstance, what you need to do is to obey, otherwise you may lose your job. So（貌似so 在这里是个连词，不是副词，不能独立成句，这里是个断句，So可以改为therefore,hence这些副词可以独立成句）这个问题好好问下，也就是说so一般都是连接两个句子的，若我前面打了句号，都不该用了哇） the way a person dressed totally has no correlation with his or her own style.
这个例子挺好的
In other situations, I agree with this argument that the personality can be seen on this small daily activity. If we do not like the style of the cloth, we probably will not buy it. So (同样的问题)the choosing process shows your thought and characters. Take one famous dancer in China YangLiping as an example（take A as an example应该是个祈使句，所以后面可以用逗号，不能直接跟一个句子）（抱歉，这里没懂，能否再讲讲）, although she is a celebrity with a（不定冠词a貌似可以去掉） considerable income, she never put money on some luxurious clothing. She is fascinated by the exotic clothes, some of which are presented a certain culture with religious meaning and some of which are printed the scene of the nature. From the way she dressed, we can certainly get some information about her personality.
In addition, some people may argue that nowadays many people are flow（这个用法我不是很看明白） the fashion. So the dress has no reference to people's true opinions. However, i would like to say following the crowd is just a reflection of their personalities. Not all people like to follow the smart clothes which are changeable every year（感觉这样修饰有点不简洁直接为smart changeable clothes好点）,（加连词because） they have their own life pace and style. The people who afraid they are old-fashioned implicate they like to be the same with others.(不是很看懂改句啊) Perhaps they do not know what they truly want and have little confidence on themselves. （改成这样呢on the other hand,wearing the latest fashion indicates that this kind of people like to be the same with others and do not know what they truly want）
As the reason I listed above, when(whether) the way a person dressed is an indication of his or her personality depends on different situations whether he or she can truly express himself/herself(这句有两个whether了，我不是很清楚这样改后可以吗). As the position required, the clothes is nothing (not correlation) with the personality while other circumstances the way is definitely a good reference to a person's character.
To serena: 每次看到别人认真的批改都很感动。因为规则必须要改，但改的多认真这个都看个人了。谢谢！ 我写完还检查了一遍没想到还是错了那么多。表达也很不地道，瓶颈期写来写去没长进。最近在看“慎小嶷”的那本书，你说的那个是不是就是北美范文185哇？（小白已自行解决，下下来了...) 再问3个问题： 1， “he conceals the reality andpretend everythinggo(goes) on the right way (我查了一下，everygoes the right way 应该更好一些).” 先不说意思，单看句子 一个主语两个动词，其中一个加的是从句是不是有点奇怪？ 2, Imaging (Imagine) this circumstance, the mistake has already beendetected by the leader... 我想问下，那个imagine会不会造成有两个动词了这句，虽然我觉得imaging开头，mistake主语也不对。 3， understandings(understandings是可数名词？？) 我知道有a much deeper understanding 于是又查了个句子：our behaviouris correspond with that of othersbase onserious of evaluations and understandings.你觉得呢
TO Serena: 感觉你很忙的啊~~~话说有男僧会喜欢这么柔的名字和这么小乖的头像吗，咦，我这是在夸自己吗 我就是G的语法没学通。。。一知半解的。。。那个第二句啊， (Imagine) this circumstance, the mistake has already been detected by the leader... 一句话两个动词没有and连句子啊，为啥呢。表打我 最后一句话 默默心里没底的飘过~~~
TO Serena: 感觉你很忙的啊~~~话说有男僧会喜欢这么柔的名字和这么小乖的头像吗，咦，我这是在夸自己吗 我就是G的语法没学通。。。一知半解的。。。那个第二句啊， (Imagine) this circumstance, the mistake has already been detected by the leader... 一句话两个动词没有and连句子啊，为啥呢。表打我 最后一句话 默默心里没底的飘过~~~
8月21日 综合 tpo19 第一次写这么少的字，想看看自己写清楚没 The speaker rejects the ideas in the reading passage that buzzing has many disadvantages that it should be banned. He contends that buzzing has its own merits.
To begin with, the speaker does not agree with the first opinion in the material that buzzing gives people incorrect information. He argues back that buzzers do tell the truth, because they have used the product themselves and think it is good. Although buzzers are paid, they accept the employ for good usage experience.
Furthermore, the speaker challenges the second point. He explains that people always ask him a lot of questions about the product, and if he can not answer well, the potential customer will not buy the product. This means customers do not accept the claims without thinking. On the contrary, the reading material states that people are less critical about the products that buzzers recommend.
In addition, regarding the social relationship, the speaker claims that if the product is not good enough, the company will not recruit buzzers. The function of buzzers is to set good example of the usage experience. As a matter of fact, the buzzing can establish a trustful atmosphere. On the other hand, the reading passage states that buzzing will cause the spread of mistrust.
The speaker rejects the ideas in the reading passage that buzzing has many disadvantages that it should be banned. He contends that buzzing has its own merits.
To begin with, the speaker does not agree with the first opinion in the material that buzzing gives people incorrect information. He argues back that buzzers do tell the truth,because they have used the product themselves and think it is good. Although buzzers are paid, they accept the employ for good usage experience.
Furthermore, the speaker challenges the second point. He explains that people always ask him a lot of questions about the product, and if he can not answer well, the potential customer will not buy the product. This means customers do not accept the claims without thinking.On the contrary, the reading material states that people are less critical about the products that buzzers recommend.
In addition, regarding the social relationship, the speaker claims that if the product is not good enough, the company will not recruit buzzers. 这里我听到的是will not be able to 。意思有些偏差The function of buzzers is to set good example of the usage experience. As a matter of fact, the buzzing can establish a trustful atmosphere. On the other hand, the reading passage states that buzzing will cause the spread of mistrust.
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2012-8-20 15:58:30
楼主
