以下是引用jones79在2005-4-8 17:46:00的发言:请问og第44篇的下面这句该如何理解: og对265解释是这样的: weaving和combing and carding都是low-skill jobs,但根据平行结构in certain low-skill jobs ......but not in others....应该对low-skill jobs取非呀那不就么? 请大伙帮我看看,哪根筋每理顺???
这是一个省略结构,把句子补全了就是:
In addition, the human capital theory explains why there was a high concentra-
tion of women workers in certain low-skill jobs, such as weaving, but not a high concentration of women workers in others, such as combing or carding, by positing that because of their primary responsibility in child rearing women took occupations that could be carried out in the home.
说明but not是对high concentration 取非, 而others 是指other low-skill jobs. 之所以把certain low-skill jobs和others进行对比,是因为certain low-skill jobs可以carried out in the home而others不行. |