求给位帮我看个题~~~

turbidtear

14. Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm other as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person’s decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?
A. Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.
B. Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.
C. Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.
D. The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.
E. In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.


答案是B，请问D为什么不对？

alzn2765

D属于无关比较。跟本题的逻辑链没产生什么关系。只要你的死没有对其他人的利益产生危害，死多死少，都不会削弱结论。

本体的逻辑链是：只要我任性的冒我自己的险而不伤害他人的利益，捆不捆忙绑是我自己的权利，不管你们屁事。

B选项指出，其实因为你的任性冒险，让所有人的保额都升高了，Money issue啊！你说你伤害到了老子利益没？

B削弱了结论。