请大神进来讲解一下 此题我已抓狂 OG 113

maplestage

113. 正确答案是 C ，感觉完全看不懂此题的逻辑链 而且请教下 这个题是属于support类型吗

The averagehourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland has long been significantlylower than that in neighboring Borodia. Since Borodia dropped all tariffs onVernlandian televisions three years ago, the number of televisions soldannually in Borodia has not changed. However, recent statistics show a drop inthe number of television assemblers in Borodia. Therefore, updated tradestatistics will probably indicate that the number of televisions Borodiaimports annually from Vernland has increased.
Which of thefollowing is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) The number oftelevision assemblers in Vernland has increased by at least as much as thenumber of television assemblers in Borodia has decreased.

(B) Televisionsassembled in Vernland have features that televisions assembled in Borodia donot have.

C) The averagenumber of hours it takes a Borodian television assembler to assemble atelevision has not decreased significantly during the past three years.

(D) The number oftelevisions assembled annually in Vernland has increased significantly duringthe past three years.

(E) The differencebetween the hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland and the hourlywage of television assemblers in Borodia is likely to decrease in the next fewyears.

maplestage

顶一下！11

shaopeiyuan0511

来，这题不是属于Support，是属于Assumption。（具体内容你可以参见曼哈顿语法的分类）
Assumption类似搭桥，就是把你思想逻辑上的漏洞（Gap）填起来让句子更加有说服力。

意思呢是：
The averagehourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland has long been significantlylower than that in neighboring Borodia.
电视组装人员的平均工资V<B，这是一个P

Since Borodia dropped all tariffs on Vernlandian televisions three years ago, the number of televisions sold annually in Borodia has not changed.
B的关税减免了，而B地的销售量并没有改变。（这里就是暗示可能是由V地进口哟！），另一个P

However, recent statistics show a drop inthe number of television assemblers in Borodia.
又说了B地的电视组装人员少了，又暗示，恩可能从业人员少了。P。

Therefore, updated tradestatistics will probably indicate that the number of televisions Borodia imports annually from Vernland has increased.
所以说B地找V地进口的电视数量多了~ 结论，C。

Which of thefollowing is an assumption on which the argument depends?
问assumption，看看有没有gap，通常是要看看有没有其他原因可以排除，自然就会更紧凑的论证。

(A) The number oftelevision assemblers in Vernland has increased by at least as much as thenumber of television assemblers in Borodia has decreased.
屁话，说了白说。无关解释进口电视的数量。

(B) Televisionsassembled in Vernland have features that televisions assembled in Borodia donot have.
如果V生产的电视有B没有的功能呢！好像有点关系，但是要和组装员联系起来，无关，错。

C) The averagenumber of hours it takes a Borodian television assembler to assemble atelevision has not decreased significantly during the past three years.
这个说，不是时间的关系哟！你想，就是排除他因，使得论证更加紧密，对。

(D) The number oftelevisions assembled annually in Vernland has increased significantly duringthe past three years.
V的人数多了~可是不是唯一的原因，可能是V自己的需求多了呢。

(E) The differencebetween the hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland and the hourlywage of television assemblers in Borodia is likely to decrease in the next fewyears.
这个就更无关了。

看看曼哈顿吧，继续想，加油！

maplestage

shaopeiyuan0511 发表于 2015-3-8 17:47
来，这题不是属于Support，是属于Assumption。（具体内容你可以参见曼哈顿语法的分类）
Assumption类似搭桥 ...

非常感谢 大神！！ 虽然晚了点 哈啊哈