|
Many managers are influenced by
dangerous myths about pay that lead
to counterproductive decisions about
Line how their companies compensate
(5) employees. One such myth is that
labor rates, the rate per hour paid to
workers, are identical with labor costs,
the money spent on labor in relation to
the productivity of the labor force.
(10) This myth leads to the assumption that
a company can simply lower its labor
costs by cutting wages. But labor
costs and labor rates are not in fact
the same: one company could pay
(15) its workers considerably more than
another and yet have lower labor
costs if that company’s productivity
were higher due to the talent of its
workforce, the efficiency of its work
(20) processes, or other factors. The
confusion of costs with rates per-
sists partly because labor rates are
a convenient target for managers who
want to make an impact on their com-
(25) pany’s budgets. Because labor rates
are highly visible, managers can easily
compare their company’s rates with
those of competitors. Furthermore,
labor rates often appear to be a
(30) company’s most malleable financial
variable: cutting wages appears an
easier way to control costs than such
options as reconfiguring work pro-
cesses or altering product design.
(35) The myth that labor rates and labor
costs are equivalent is supported by
business journalists, who frequently
confound the two. For example, prom-
inent business journals often remark on
(40) the “high” cost of German labor, citing
as evidence the average amount paid
to German workers. The myth is also
perpetuated by the compensation-
consulting industry, which has its own
(45) incentives to keep such myths alive.
First, although some of these con-
sulting firms have recently broadened
their practices beyond the area of
compensation, their mainstay con-
(50) tinues to be advising companies on
changing their compensation prac-
tices. Suggesting that a company’s
performance can be improved in
some other way than by altering its
(55) pay system may be empirically cor-
rect but contrary to the consultants’
interests. Furthermore, changes
to the compensation system may
appear to be simpler to implement
(60) than changes to other aspects of an
organization, so managers are more
likely to find such advice from con-
sultants palatable. Finally, to the
extant that changes in compensation
(65) create new problems, the consultants
will continue to have work solving the
problems that result from their advice.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q22:
The author of the passage suggests which of the following about the advice that the consulting firms discussed in the passage customarily give to companies attempting to control costs?
- It often fails to bring about the intended changes in companies’ compensation systems.
- It has highly influenced views that predominate in prominent business journals.
- It tends to result in decreased labor rates but increased labor costs.
- It leads to changes in companies’ compensation practices that are less visible than changes to work processes would be.
- It might be different if the consulting firms were less narrowly specialized.
给出的答案是A，但我选了B。我觉得A并不恰当，原文最后一句的意思是：咨询公司给出的办法并不能彻底解决问题（他们还是有事做will continue to have work solving the problems that result from their advice),并不能得出他们的意见不会引起benefits package的改变（也诜package是改变了，但想要降低成本的目的没有达到）。事实上企业一般都是采纳了咨询公司提出的降低工资的建议。倒是选项B说咨询公司的意见对于prominent business journals有深远的影响，因为journals也是赞成降低工资的。
请教！！ 
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-2-25 22:26:12编辑过] | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2005-2-25 22:24:00
楼主