没有在大全里看到这道题,不知是没有还是我没搜到。打出来。
209
Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida's river and coastal waters, swim close to the surface and are frequently killed in collisions with boats. To address the problem, boat traffic in manatee-populated water is being required to maintain very low speeds. Unfortunately, manatees are unable to hear low-pitched wounds and a boat's sound lower in pitch as the boat slows. Therefore, this approach may in fact make things worse rather than better
Which of the following, if true, casts most doubt on the conclusion?
- The area where boats would have to maintain low speeds were decided partly on the basis of manatee-population estimates and partly from numbers of reported collisions between manatees and boats
- Because the water hyacinth that manatees feed on grows best in water that is nearly still, water hyacinth beds can be disturbed or damaged by fast-moving boat traffic
- Over the last several decade, boat traffic in Florida's coastal water has been increasing almost continuously and now represents the greatest threat to the endangered manatee population
- The sound of boat engine generally travels much further under water than it does through the air
- When experimenters exposed manatees to the recorded sounds of boats moving at various speed, the creatures were unable to discern the sounds over normal back ground noise.
答案e
逻辑:
因为无法听见低速--〉worse than better
Ets weaken
无所谓,因为高速它也听不见。
是这个推导吗?
我选的B
我的逻辑:
因为无法听见低速--〉worse than better
可是高速行驶还有坏处,破坏beds
低速,不好;说“高速,也不好”无法削弱。所以B不对。
请解惑。谢谢
|