ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 10601|回复: 15
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD12-25-26

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-2-13 04:54:00 | 只看该作者

GWD12-25-26

Q24 to Q27:

     Years before the advent of plate
                    

            tectonics─the widely accepted theory,

            developed in the mid-1960’s, the holds

Line     that the major features of Earth’s surface

  (5)      are created by the horizontal motions

of Earth’s outer shell, or lithosphere─

a similar theory was rejected by the

geological community.  In 1912, Alfred

Wegener proposed, in a widely debated

(10)     theory that came to be called continental

drift, that Earth’s continents were mobile.

To most geologists today, Wegener’s

The origin of Continents and Oceans

appears an impressive and prescient

(15)     document, containing several of the

essential presumptions underlying plate

tectonics theory: the horizontal mobility

of pieces of Earth’s crust; the essential

difference between oceanic and conti-

(20)     nental crust; and a causal connection

            between horizontal displacements and

            the formation of mountain chains.  Yet

despite the considerable overlap

between Wegener’s concepts and the

(25)     later widely embraced plate tectonics

theory, and despite the fact that conti-

nental drift theory presented a possible

solution to the problem of the origin of

mountains at a time when existing expla-

(30)     nations were seriously in doubt, in its

day Wegener’s theory was rejected

by the vast majority of geologists.

                  Most geologists and many historians

today believe that Wegener’s theory

(35)    was rejected because of its lack of an

adequate mechanical basis.  Stephen

Jay Gould, for example, argues that

continental drift theory was rejected

because it did not explain how continents

(40)     could move through an apparently solid

oceanic floor.  However, as Anthony

Hallam has pointed out, many scientific

phenomena, such as the ice ages, have

been accepted before they could be fully

(45)     explained.  The most likely cause for the

rejection of continental drift─a cause

that has been largely ignored because

we consider Wegener’s theory to have

been validated by the theory of plate

(50)     tectonics─is the nature of the evidence

that was put forward to support it.  Most

of Wegener’s evidence consisted of

homologies-similarities of patterns and

forms based on direct observations of

(55)     rocks in the field, supported by the use

of hammers, hand lenses, and field note-

books.  In contrast, the data supporting

plate tectonics were impressively

geophysical-instrumental determinations

(60)     of the physical properties of Earth gar-

nered through the use of seismographs,

magnetometers, and computers.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q25:

The author of the passage refers to the “considerable overlap” (line 23) between continental drift theory and plate tectonics theory most probably in order to

  1. suggest that plate tectonics theory is derived from Wegener’s work
  2. introduce a discussion comparing the elements of the two theories
  3. examine the question of whether continental drift theory was innovative in its time
  4. provide a reason why it might seem surprising that continental drift theory was not more widely embraced by geologists
  5. cite an explanation that has been frequently offered for Wegener’s high standing among geologists today

Answer: D

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q26:

The author of the passage suggests that the most likely explanation for the geological community’s response to continental drift theory in its day was that the theory

  1. was in conflict with certain aspects of plate tectonics theory
  2. failed to account for how mountains were formed
  3. did not adequately explain how continents moved through the ocean floor
  4. was contradicted by the geophysical data of the time
  5. was based on a kind of evidence that was considered insufficiently convincing

Answer: E

请问这两道题的答案是从怎么推出来的啊?我推出的答案是E 和A。

  1. was in conflict with certain aspects of plate tectonics theory
  2. failed to account for how mountains were formed
  3. did not adequately explain how continents moved through the ocean floor
  4. was contradicted by the geophysical data of the time
  5. was based on a kind of evidence that was considered insufficiently convincing

Answer: E

请问这两道题的答案是从怎么推出来的啊?我推出的答案是E 和A。

P.s 这篇文章好像还没有被讨论过呢。


沙发
发表于 2005-3-12 12:59:00 | 只看该作者

【Q25】


Yet despite the considerable overlap


between Wegener’s concepts and the


(25)     later widely embraced plate tectonics


theory, and despite the fact that conti-


nental drift theory presented a possible


solution to the problem of the origin of


mountains at a time when existing expla-


(30)     nations were seriously in doubt, in its


day Wegener’s theory was rejected


by the vast majority of geologists.


We can tell from the above statement that the continental drift theory might be a good theory, but it was not convinced people. In short, it is suprising that this theory was not accepted by geologist in his time.




【Q26】  


Wegener’s theory to have


been validated by the theory of plate


(50)     tectonics―is the nature of the evidence


that was put forward to support it.


I think choice E is the best.


You can also refer to


http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=25&ID=75069




[此贴子已经被作者于2005-3-12 13:00:18编辑过]
板凳
发表于 2005-4-18 11:48:00 | 只看该作者
请问27题为什么选A, 我选的是B,  A在原文中哪里可以定位? 请NN指点
地板
发表于 2005-4-18 11:50:00 | 只看该作者
第27题美人讨论? 大家都明白了?
5#
发表于 2005-4-18 12:58:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-12-Q27:

It can be inferred from the passage that geologists today would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements about Wegener’s The Origin of Continents and Oceans?

  1. It was a worthy scientific effort that was ahead of its time.

  2. It was based on evidence that was later disproved.
  3. It was directly responsible for the acceptance of the theory of plate tectonics.
  4. It has been disproved by continental drift theory.
  5. It misrepresented how horizontal displacements cause the formation of mountain chains.

A paragraphase the sentence of the passage: To most geologists today, Wegener’s The origin of Continents and Oceans appears an impressive and prescient(预知的) (15)      document, containing several of the essential presumptions underlying plate tectonics theory. prescient means ahead of time.

B contracdit the following passage: it implies that Wegner's  theory is success from the later people's point.

containing several of the essential presumptions underlying plate tectonics theory: the horizontal mobility of pieces of Earth’s crust; the essential difference between oceanic and conti-(20)     nental crust; and a causal connection between horizontal displacements and the formation of mountain chains.  Yet despite the considerable overlap between Wegener’s concepts and the (25)     later widely embraced plate tectonics theory,

6#
发表于 2005-4-29 15:24:00 | 只看该作者
  1. It was a worthy scientific effort that was ahead of its time.
  2. It was based on evidence that was later disproved.
  3. It was directly responsible for the acceptance of the theory of plate tectonics.
  4. It has been disproved by continental drift theory.
  5. It misrepresented how horizontal displacements cause the formation of mountain chains.

A paragraphase the sentence of the passage: To most geologists today, Wegener’s The origin of Continents and Oceans appears an impressive and prescient(预知的) (15)      document, containing several of the essential presumptions underlying plate tectonics theory. prescient means ahead of time.

B contracdit the following passage: it implies that Wegner's  theory is success from the later people's point.

班主能对B再解释一下吗?我的定位是45)     explained.  The most likely cause for the

rejection of continental drift―a cause

that has been largely ignored because

we consider Wegener’s theory to have

been validated by the theory of plate

(50)     tectonics―is the nature of the evidence

that was put forward to support it.  Most

of Wegener’s evidence consisted of

homologies

请耐心指教,谢谢

7#
发表于 2005-4-29 15:27:00 | 只看该作者

A。It was a worthy scientific effort that was ahead of its time.

A paragraphase the sentence of the passage: To most geologists today, Wegener’s The origin of Continents and Oceans appears an impressive and prescient(预知的) (15)      document, containing several of the essential presumptions underlying plate tectonics theory. prescient means ahead of time.

A是不是就是考prescient(预知的)啊!

谢谢


8#
发表于 2005-4-29 15:56:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用Dennies在2005-4-29 15:27:00的发言:

A。It was a worthy scientific effort that was ahead of its time.


A paragraphase the sentence of the passage: To most geologists today, Wegener’s The origin of Continents and Oceans appears an impressive and prescient(预知的) (15)      document, containing several of the essential presumptions underlying plate tectonics theory. prescient means ahead of time.


A是不是就是考prescient(预知的)啊!


谢谢




Agree.

9#
发表于 2005-5-3 19:58:00 | 只看该作者
Wegener的板块漂移理论是对的,并且被后人所支持,但是理论证明的论据不充分,数据过于简单,测量工具过于简陋,所以在当时不值得信服
10#
发表于 2005-5-10 04:17:00 | 只看该作者
25题E怎么不对呢?觉得D有点远,E更直接
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-28 12:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部