天山-3-33

demon_hunter

以下是引用seekmydream在2005-10-15 2:10:00的发言：

回答楼上

文章第一段末句说: 制造业虽然就业比例低但生产率高而服务业正好相反----discrepancy

文章最后一段讲了作者支持的解释budget deficit.大意是:赤字低-->利率低-->投资高-->生产率高,但技术并不缺乏(言下之意投资并不低,生产率应该也高才对呀),注意rather后面,才是真正原因所在:managers in the service sector fail to take advantage of widely available skills and mahines.这里关键是理解这段话,作者并没有否定赤字的解释,本来这一解释同样适应于制造业和服务业,只不过制造业善用资源了而服务业没有,才形成了discrepancy.文章后面继续解释为什么服务业没有这样做.

A. Research shows that the federal budge deficit has traditionally caused service companies to invest less money in research and development of new technologies.

最易混淆的选项A好象将deficit之说weaken了,其实有trick的,看红字部分,并没说deficit是高是低啊.再说,也没有点到结论discrepancy.跟逻辑题貌似而神非的无关选项如出一辙.

E High interest rates tend to slow the growth of manufacturing productivity as much as they slow the growth of service-sector productivity in the United States.

利率高-->生产率低(weaken了deficit的推理关系),而且对制造业和服务业的效果一样.所以,weaken the budget-deficit explanation for the discrepancy mentioned in line 27.

hopefully can help

It definitely helps!
我完全把这道题目理解错了，呵呵~~

Thanks again,
Demon Hunter

lancome130

33题,答案是E没有错。

注意文中if it were lower, interest rates would be lower (60) too, thereby increasing investment in the development of new technol- ogies, which would spur productivity growth in the service sector.用的是虚拟语气，因此实际情况是赤字高导致没有采用高科技技术以实现生产率提高。A答案是将文中内容表述乐一边，加强。E正好是所要的答案：赤字高不是原因，否则不能解释制造业生产率的提高。他因解释。

MaccMichAA

...

MaccMichAA

以下是引用lancome130在2006-7-28 12:43:00的发言：

33题,答案是E没有错。

注意文中if it were lower, interest rates would be lower (60) too, thereby increasing investment in the development of new technol- ogies, which would spur productivity growth in the service sector.用的是虚拟语气，因此实际情况是赤字高导致没有采用高科技技术以实现生产率提高。A答案是将文中内容表述乐一边，加强。E正好是所要的答案：赤字高不是原因，否则不能解释制造业生产率的提高。他因解释。

弱弱地说 E我觉得不是他因 

小的觉得应该是同因异果的削弱方式

narcissus1225

以下是引用seekmydream在2005-10-15 2:10:00的发言：

文章最后一段讲了作者支持的解释budget deficit.大意是:赤字低-->利率低-->投资高-->生产率高,但技术并不缺乏(言下之意投资并不低,生产率应该也高才对呀),注意rather后面,才是真正原因所在:managers in the service sector fail to take advantage of widely available skills and mahines.这里关键是理解这段话,作者并没有否定赤字的解释,本来这一解释同样适应于制造业和服务业,只不过制造业善用资源了而服务业没有,才形成了discrepancy.文章后面继续解释为什么服务业没有这样做.

There

is, however, no dearth of techno-

(60)                          logical resources, rather, managers

in the service sector fail to take

advantage of widely available skills

and machines.
            

這句話想了很久，還是不太清楚該如何解析, 怎麼看怎麼怪

有人可以翻譯一下或是講解一下嗎?

感謝!!

sabrina07

因此，并不是因为服务业缺少技术资源，而是因为服务业的经理们没有利用好这些丰富的资源（如技术、机器设备），从而导致服务业的生产率下降。

fighteding

以下是引用ddmm2002在2005-2-28 11:58:00的发言：

Since

(10) 1980, productivity improvements

in manufacturing have moved the

United States from a position of

acute decline in manufacturing

to one of world prominence.

题目问得不是prior to 1980吗？这里说的是since 1980，这不就是之后的情况吗？1980年之前的情况还是每年增加1%啊

tootoo5478

One is that tra- (30) ditional measures fail to reflect service-sector productivity growth because it has been concentrated in improved quality of services.   Yet traditional measures of manu- (35) facturing productivity have shown significant increases despite the undermeasurement of quality, whereas service productivity has continued to stagnate

请问一下这一句话...虽然没考到...
        
大家认为这句话的观念..就是服务业生产成长下降是因为传统测量法没有办法将品质因素考量进去...这句作者到底是持肯定?否定?还是中立看法?
中间转折字Yet看起来像承接上面一句的连接词..不像作者在反驳...还是其实作者是用另外一个角度反驳?
我真的看不太出来.到底这句话功能何在..有人可以开示一下吗?

天天灿烂

同意为E选项。

yuching730

天山3-Q33

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the budget-deficit explanation for the discrepancy mentioned in line 27?

A. Research shows that the federal budge deficit has traditionally caused service companies to invest less money in research and development of new technologies.
                

B. New technologies have been shown to play a significant role in companies that have been able to increase their service productivity.

C in both the service sector and manufacturing, productivity improvements are concertrated in gains in quality

D The service sector typically requires larger investments in new technology in order to maintain productivity growth than dose manufacturing

E High interest rates tend to slow the growth of manufacturing productivity as much as they slow the growth of service-sector productivity in the United States.

 

 

这题为何大家都是支持E选吗?老实说虽然我看了楼上牛人的解释但还是搞不清楚在说什么?

 

以下是楼上某位牛人的解释:

文章第一段末句说: 制造业虽然就业比例低但生产率高而服务业正好相反----discrepancy 文章最后一段讲了作者支持的解释budget deficit.大意是:赤字低-->利率低-->投资高-->生产率高,但技术并不缺乏(言下之意投资并不低,生产率应该也高才对呀),注意rather后面,才是真正原因所在:managers in the service sector fail to take advantage of widely available skills and mahines.这里关键是理解这段话,作者并没有否定赤字的解释,本来这一解释同样适应于制造业和服务业,只不过制造业善用资源了而服务业没有,才形成了discrepancy.文章后面继续解释为什么服务业没有这样做. A. Research shows that the federal budge deficit has traditionally caused service companies to invest less money in research and development of new technologies.                          最易混淆的选项A好象将deficit之说weaken了,其实有trick的,看红字部分,并没说deficit是高是低啊.再说,也没有点到结论discrepancy.跟逻辑题貌似而神非的无关选项如出一辙. E High interest rates tend to slow the growth of manufacturing productivity as much as they slow the growth of service-sector productivity in the United States. 利率高-->生产率低(weaken了deficit的推理关系),而且对制造业和服务业的效果一样.所以,weaken the budget-deficit explanation for the discrepancy mentioned in line 27.

 

 

老实说我的问题是题目问: would most weaken the budget-deficit explanation for the discrepancy mentioned in line 27?

我也同意文章budget deficit.大意是:
                赤字低-->利率低-->投资高-->生产率高,但是对于利率高-->生产率低(weaken了deficit的推理关系)这边怎么看出来?????

还有技术并不缺乏(言下之意投资并不低,生产率应该也高才对呀) 这边怎么看出来『投资并不低,生产率应该也高』?????

还有作者有支持这个budget deficit.吗????

因为我是以federal budget deficit: if it were lower, interest rates would be lower too, thereby increasing investment in the development of new technologies, which would spur productivity growth in the service sector. There is, however, no dearth of technological resources….

我认为前面是federal budget deficit的大意,但注意后面不是有出现however应该是作者不赞同吧???????

最后这题是要weaken budget-deficit explanation????还是要找出矛盾点????(连题目要问什么都不清楚真要命!!!!!!!!)

请大家帮忙回答………以改正我的思路上哪里有问题?????????