gwd问题求助

lainemai

A major health insurance company in Lagolia pays for special procedures prescribed by physicians only if the procedure is first approved as "medically necessary" by a company-appointed review panel. The rule is intended to save the company the money it might otherwise spend on medically unnecessary procedures. The company has recently announced that in order to reduce its costs, it will abandon this rule.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest justification for the company's decision?

• APatients often register dissatisfaction with physicians who prescribe nothing for their ailments.  
• BPhysicians often prescribe special procedures that are helpful but not altogether necessary for the health of the patient.  
• CThe review process is expensive and practically always results in approval of the prescribed procedure.  
• DThe company's review process does not interfere with the prerogative of physicians, in cases where more than one effective procedure is available, to select the one they personally prefer.  
• EThe number of members of the company-appointed review panel who review a given procedure depends on the cost of the procedure.
• 这道题的答案是C，但是我当时选的是B，我觉的推理是医生给病人开不必要的special procedures→加重审查程序→从而不可能降低cost，这样的推理难道不对吗？求大神解释~~
  

Nagi

这道题是说rule没用、而b是说physician没用