求助Manhattan上的一道逻辑题

anan_ma

Products with innovative and appealing designs relative to competing products can often command substantially higher prices in the marketplace. Because design innovations are quickly copied by other manufacturers, many consumer technology companies charge as much as possible for their new designs to extract as much value as possible from them. But large profits generated by the innovative designs give competitors stronger incentives to copy the designs. Therefore, the best strategy to maximize overall profit from an innovative new design is to charge less than the greatest possible price.

(B) The first is a consideration that helps explain the appeal of a certain stragegy; the second presents an alternative strategy endorsed by the argument.
(C) The first is a phenomenon that justifies a specific strategy; the second is that strategy.
答案是C，但是我选的B，而且我现在也觉得B没什么问题。我觉得第一个BF是两个strategy的premise。谁能帮助分析一下？
此外，consideration是指什么呢？premise?evidence?claim?