GMAC Verbal Review的一道题VCR000905

peyyy

The cause of the wreck of the ship Edmund Fitzgeraid in a severe storm on lake Superior is still unknown , when the sunken wreckage of the vessel was round , searchers discovered the hull in two pieces lying close together , The storm's violent waves would have caused separate pieces floating even briefly on the surface to drift apart. Therefore, the breakup of the hull can be ruled out as the cause of the sinking.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument dipends?


A.Ships as large as the Edmund Fitzgerald rarely sink except in the most violent weather.


B.Under water currents at the time of the storm did not move the separated pieces of the hull together again .

C.Pieces of the hull would have sunk more quickly than the intact hull would have

D.The waves of the storm were not violent enough to have caused the breakup

E.If the ship broke up before sinking , the pieces of the hull would not have remained on the surface for very long

请教一道题我是用排除法做对的，但是逻辑链没有很清晰，谢谢！

lainemai

The cause of the wreck of the ship Edmund Fitzgeraid in a severe storm on lake Superior is still unknown , when the sunken wreckage of the vessel was round , searchers discovered the hull in two pieces lying close together , The storm's violent waves would have caused separate pieces floating even briefly on the surface to drift apart. Therefore, the breakup of the hull can be ruled out as the cause of the sinking.

Premise:EE这艘船在苏比列湖上的风暴中毁坏的原因尚未清楚
Premise:残骸找到的时候，搜寻员发现h这个东西是紧紧靠在一起的
Premise:暴风雨的浪潮一般都会将这两片东西分开的
Conclusion:因此船体的破坏可以是排除是沉没的原因造成的
分清前提和结论就好选