ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1155|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

逻辑题求助

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-8-1 14:42:46 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
. There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be officially confirmed before being published. There is a system in place for the confirmation or disconfirmation of scientific findings, namely, the replication of results by other scientists. Poor scientific work on the part of any one scientists, which can include anything from careless reporting practices to fraud, is not harmful. It will be exposed and rendered harmless when other scientists conduct experiments and obtain disconfirmatory results.
Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument?
A. Scientific experiments can go unchallenged for many years before they are replicated.
B. Most scientists work in universities, where their work is submitted to peer review before publication.
C. Most scientists are under pressure to make their work accessible to the scrutiny of replication.
D. In scientific experiments, careless reporting is more common than fraud.
E. Most scientists work as part of a team rather than alone.
答案:A
思路:作者说no必要有一个新的出版confirmation系统,因为Poor scientific work is not harmfulother scientists conduct experiments来正明正确的结果。A指出Scientific experiments can go unchallenged for many years,指出Poor scientific work is harmful,是weaken
A. 无关
B. 无关
C. 无关
D. 无关



这个题目看不懂啊,有没有大神帮忙解释下。。。。 拜托了
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2014-8-1 14:51:10 | 只看该作者
75. Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentrating one sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?

A.The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.
B.Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.
C.The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.
D.People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.
E.It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.

答案:C
思路:
A.支持但不是最强
B.advertisers考虑了publication转变了不同的读者群,还是financial considerations。
C.直接举证说明原因:是为了moral,应为sales会increase if they stayed with the changed publication,但sales会decrease if they withdrew。
D.无关
E.无关

还有这一道啊。。分析不出来了。。。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2014-8-1 16:28:45 | 只看该作者
咋没人呀。。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 22:57
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部