- UID
- 955961
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2013-11-7
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors who were also foragers. A flaw in this strategy is that forager societies are extremely varied. Indeed, any forager society with which anthropologists are familiar has had considerable contact withmodern, non-forager societies. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the criticism made above of the anthropologists’ strategy?
只是对两个选项有疑问:
(A) All forager societies throughout history have hada number of important features in common thatare absent from other types of societies.
(D) Many anthropologists who study modern-day forager societies do not draw inferences about ancient societies on the basis of their studies.
答案是A,理由是This statement properly identifies the factor that weakens the argument: A comparison could well be a valuable source of understanding if all foraging societies are shown to share certain features not found in other societies.
但我觉得D更好。问题是哪个选项most weaken the criticism of the strategy,这里的strategy是study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors。D选项说的是do not draw inferences,说anthropologists没有采用inference这种strategy(注意inference只是study的一种strategy,还有很多另外的strategies);如果没有infer,那用来study的就是其他的strategies,这些策略并不一定存在和inference strategy一样的问题,因为题干中提出的variety、connection只有在人们根据modern外推至ancient时才会出现问题。
Is it right?
Thank you!
|
|