| 
 
UID955961在线时间 小时注册时间2013-11-7最后登录1970-1-1主题帖子性别保密 
 | 
 
| Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors who were also foragers. A flaw in this strategy is that forager societies are extremely varied. Indeed, any forager society with which anthropologists are familiar has had considerable contact withmodern, non-forager societies. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the criticism made above of the anthropologists’ strategy? 只是对两个选项有疑问:
 (A)  All forager societies throughout history have hada number of important features in common thatare absent from other types of societies.
 (D)  Many anthropologists who study modern-day forager societies do not draw inferences about ancient societies on the basis of their studies.
 
 答案是A,理由是This statement properly identifies the factor that weakens the argument: A comparison could well be a valuable source of understanding if all foraging societies are shown to share certain features not found in other societies.
 但我觉得D更好。问题是哪个选项most weaken the criticism of the strategy,这里的strategy是study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors。D选项说的是do not draw inferences,说anthropologists没有采用inference这种strategy(注意inference只是study的一种strategy,还有很多另外的strategies);如果没有infer,那用来study的就是其他的strategies,这些策略并不一定存在和inference strategy一样的问题,因为题干中提出的variety、connection只有在人们根据modern外推至ancient时才会出现问题。
 Is it right?
 
 Thank you!
 
 | 
 |