第三遍看OG~~CR95 还是觉得OG解释有问题！！！

xml19921231

第三遍看OG CR了，我还是觉得这道题有问题。它的结论明明是：看到LOGO 就会SPENDE MORE.，而不是LOGO对支付有影响力。。题目强调的是看到之后对支付只有一个方面的影响啊。。。所以如果看到之后没有SPEND more 的话，个人觉得应该对结论起到削弱作用啊。。。所以B选项是削弱了，而不是反面论证了！！！

附上原题：

Studies in restaurants show that the tips left by customers who pay their bill in cash tend to be larger when the bill is presented on a tray that bears a credit-card logo. Consumer psychologists hypothesize that simply seeing a credit-card logo makes credit-card logo makes many credit-card holders willing to spend more because it reminds them that their spending power exceds the cash they have immediately available.
which of the following , if true ,most strongly supports the psychologists' interpretation of the studies?
a. The effect noted in the studies is not limited to patrons who have credit cards.
b. Patrons who are under financial pressure from their credit-card obligations tend to tip less when presented with a restaurant bill on a tray with a credit-card logo than when the tray has no lopo.
c. In virtually all of the cases in the studies, the patrons who paid bills in cash did not possess credit cards.
d. In general, restaurant patrons who pay their bills in cash leave larger tips than do  those who pay by credit card.
e. The percentage of restaurant bills paid with a given brand of credit card increases when that credit card's logo is displayed on the tray with which the bill is presented.

求指点呀呀呀~~

HermanLu

B。
题目中说  付更多的钱是因为  reminds them that their spending power exceds the cash they have immediately available
现在  under financial pressure from their credit-card obligations tend to tip less   也就是没有题目中说的那种感觉后，就付的少了

xml19921231

谢谢回复，可是还是不理解==

ladiklong

logic in the argument: patrons (NO financial pressure)  -------- their spending power EXCEEDS the cash they have ---  seeing a credit-card logo makes many credit-card holders willing to spend MORE -----------  tip MORE.

logic in the answer: patrons UNDER financial pressure  --------- their spending power LESS than the cash they have --- seeing a credit-card logo makes many credit-card holders willing to spend LESS  ------------ tip LESS.

same logic, thus the answer strengthened the argument.

no Chinese input in library computer, hope it is clearly to you.

xml19921231

ladiklong 发表于 2014-7-24 01:44
logic in the argument: patrons (NO financial pressure)  -------- their spending power EXCEEDS the ca ...

thank you!!! it is really clear !!! May be  i just misunderstood the intention of GMAC.

Satanilles

ladiklong 发表于 2014-7-24 01:44
logic in the argument: patrons (NO financial pressure)  -------- their spending power EXCEEDS the ca ...

请问这个题跟现金支付有没有关系？题干说的是有信用卡的看到了logo提示了他们的支付能力，但是最开始说的是用现金支付的往往会付更多的小费。那教授的结论到底是啥意思，有信用卡的看到了logo会觉得自己能力更多但是还是用现金支付？？

ladiklong

Satanilles 发表于 2014-7-28 14:59
请问这个题跟现金支付有没有关系？题干说的是有信用卡的看到了logo提示了他们的支付能力，但是最开始说的 ...

最开始的重点不是是否现金支付，而是顾客支付的时候看见了什么。
教授的结论是顾客结账时看到信用卡的LOGO会想起自己有信用卡，从而觉得自己实际的钱不仅仅只有现金这么多，还有信用卡上的钱， 所以就给更多小费了。

Satanilles

ladiklong 发表于 2014-7-29 11:28
最开始的重点不是是否现金支付，而是顾客支付的时候看见了什么。
教授的结论是顾客结账时看到信用卡的LOG ...

非常感谢！我关注的点偏了

乔小萌

ladiklong 发表于 2014-7-24 01:44
logic in the argument: patrons (NO financial pressure)  -------- their spending power EXCEEDS the ca ...

很有道理。。。可以理解为“有因则有果，无因则无果”么？

西毒欧阳锋

我的疑惑：题目要论证
“有钱就会花的多”。
可是b选项，“没钱花的少”怎么论证“有钱就会花的多呢”？有财务危机的人，当他没有了，他照样可以不多tip啊。