【Native Speaker每日综合训练—36系列】【36-08】经管 Olympics

TINGYI-2014

一路狂奔补作业。八分之八~
2'57 M,T,I are compete to be the holder of the olympics. why cities so care about the game? it will cost a lot and be not profit.
3'06 the games may will benefit in other part such as it may be a signal of great nation power and boost the muddy economic.but it will bring some chellange that some opposite opinions and the policy who support to the game may not in the power when the game actually be taken. the situation will leave the debt to the next president.
1'14 the 2008 olympic used to be a hot topic but now it seem have few influence. Does the game had brought the thing the hosts experct or just face?
2'12 to hold the games, China cost a lot. it is not a cheap game and  the  country did not have as many visitors as it has expect.and many expesive buildings are not profitable.
3'43 the games have push the country to make the air cleaner and liminate the car. the goverment hope to improve the worldwile image but did not reach the goal. so holding the game is not economic profitable.maybe it just have value on face, which is enough for the authorities.
3'59 the economy may seem meet a recovery after the olympic games.and many have contribute the recovery to the game. but if you study the data deeper,you will find the same growth of the Briton people who tourist abroad. britan can hardly attract vistors.
9'20   Sochi holds the 2014 winter olympic game. will it make money? no data can be turn to help. in resentrly days, more games are hold in new emergy country. it brings more difficulties for them than the developed countries.because they will short out of professional people and places. and the fees,the sponders and other revenes can not cover the cost. the S cost most. eventhouth the games may help to creat jobs but the jobs are temprorate. Russia has very low umemployment, leading to the high human recourse cost. the games may effect little to the whloe nation but it will bring benifit to local economy.for example, it will help to improve the construstion. the local govenment seek for a good way to make use fo the buildings.
弱弱觉得，奥运会选城市的时候最好玩。所以，这个选择是个很贵的game.赢者花钱啊~~哈哈，感觉像土豪比赛~~
谢谢楼主~~

子芸儿chu

1、2'07
tokyo has won the privilege of hosting 2020 Olympic Game, and main competitor Madrid lost again, why contries strive to win this privilege?
on the face of it, spending huge money on it is not appelling.
2、3’12
看不懂啊
main reason is they are wildly popular with the voters who foot the bill. it benefits economy.
it is a risk game
3、1'01
are Beijing Olypic game an stimulation of economy or an show of face? Can five-years give us an evidence?
4、2'38
China invested huge money into the 2008 Olympic game.
but the increase of tourism just kept until 2008, then droped becuase of the tightenly visa reqirements.
in most contries which hosted the Olympic game indeed experienced the economy incease, but then the inceasing rate recovers to the normal level. and purspose-build stadiums usaully tend to be a loss of money every years.
5、3’37
air condition is no longer the concertration of the government since the Olypic game was finished.
Olympic Game has been utilized as a political purpose, which violates the original spirit of the game.
it is only about the face to China.
6、3'43
The booming tourism since the 2010 Olypic Game in Britan seems to boost economy from some data, but the fact is that the output on tourism not only depend on the foriegners expenses , but also the britons spent more on foreign holiday. So the common thought of that the booming post-Olympics tourism contributes to the economy increase seems flimsy.

psychoarya

［speaker］
The Sochi Olympic Games cost the Russian government much more money than the amount of money other governments spent on Olympics. In general, holding the Olympic Game is bad for a country’s economy. However, Britain announced that they benefit billions from the games more than they have spent on it.
Therefore, there is a heated discussion whether London get an economy boost from the 2012 Olympics. Britain government persisted that they drew their conclusion from robust and comprehensive evidence. However, the truth is quite the opposite. And a professor is annoyed at the government.
Some say the profit can be seen in the long run.

[speed]
1:40
Japan successfully defeated Madrid and Istanbul and won the next host of Olympics in 2020. In the past, Olympic cost the host countries some money. At present, hosting the game is a different business. Beijing spent a lot on Olympics but found a drop in hotel bookings. Sochi spent more money on the game. So what’s the point?
2:20
the main reason is that citizens in every country show great support for the games. And every country wants to boost its economy by hosting the games. Some officers may retire too early to see the positive effect of the games. Someone one else will be there to take the credit or the blame.
2:10
some stadiums built during Beijing Olympics have become some sort of waste of money.
2:59
Beijing is confronted with serious pollution problem. In order to guarantee the health condition of athletes, Beijing implemented several tough policies to improve its air quality. The construction during the Olympics may be one of the factors that contribute to poor air quality. China did host a successful game, but it received nothing more in the recent years. A lavish show of ‘face’ may be the most important for China to host the games.
3:01
Britons have had some good economic news. People attribute this economic success to tourism brought by the Olympics. However, Britons themselves also travel a lot on holidays. The amount of money Britons spend on other foreign countries exceeds the amount of money foreigners spend on Britain.

［obstacle］
5:59
The cost of The Sochi Olympic Games far outweigh its revenue. There is some impact on the regional economy brought by the games.
Similarly, big events such as APEC can have positive influence on the region economy.
In some countries, the infrastructure or the houses built for the games have been turned into vacation resort. Maybe in the near future, Sochi can do that too.

橘黄小猪

Speaker:
Economists always claim that the the revenue caused by hosting Olympic Games will never offset its cost. However, an articles argues that the London Olympic Games will retrieve its cost by long term revenue. But there are many obvious evidences against this argument.


Time 2
2’03
Countries are keen on hosting Olympic Games which actually cost a lot. The expense cannot offset by tourism revenue or other income.

Time 3
2’25
The citizen’s support for the hosting the games is really high.

Time 4
00’58
People harbored different attitude toward Beijing Olympic Games. Beijing Olympic Games is searching for prestige rather than the economic earnings.

Time 5
2’20
What kind of revenue will be received after the Olympic Games. The economic may achieve great surge in the hosting year, and then fall down in the following year. The stadium became empty and somebody called these building white elephant.

Time 6
3’06
The air quality was improved great during the Beijing Olympic Games through a variety of means. The spirit of Games is doubtful nowadays and People even show hostility toward the games. In China, the citizen still talks about the Beijing Olympic Games in weibo. Some people said to Chinese authorities, face may means everything.

Time 7
2’42
The tourism industry has had a surge since London host the Olympic Games. However, the tourist deficit in British is still really high.

Time 8
5’53
The Sochi Olympic games has limited impact on the Russia economy, such as lowering the unemployment rate. Some successful examples to use the infrastructure of Olympic Games may inspired Sochi.

vivianpdn

part1:
the goverment was notorious for its activities. the investvents for hosting games are all paid back ,cause it
earn more than it has originally invested.   from independent report   sth about modeling model

part2
time2: 1'59
   
first ,talk about the fact the Tokyo has succeed in bidding for the 2020 Olympics,and then introduce the history event
about  bid for the games,such as the failure in the process in various kinds of countries,then ask why countries are
all want to host the Olympic Games.

second,explain why and list some facts that the financial factors are not so appealing to countries now other than receive
the respect from the world.

time 3: 2'50

explain the concrete reasons for why countries want to hold the games.beacuse the citizens support to hold it ,regardless
of spending the extra money which originally used for public service and also because the countries bidding for the games
are all have its own contention,and list several examples,eg.China

state that the games are also risk.maybe waste some public resources and receive several protest against the country

time 4: 3'27

introduce a question :is china hold the game only for the "face" problem?  the answer is no.  simultaneously,the investment
business and tourism industry are also occur

then state the fact that not all revenue made by the goverment after the game.list examples about the water cube,bird's nest
and so on to illustrate that large spending on the infrastructure  leads to resource wastes at some extent.

time 5 : 3'59

environment problem(take a deep breath):the government do many efforts to constrain and resolve the environment problem.such
as air quility ,water pollution ,and traffic congestion ,etc.

spirit of the olympics: a trend to politics rather than a pure sports events

so ,what is finally get from it: have no economic revenue. just to show some power off ,and active organize and participate
in the international events.for China ,it seems like has achieved these goal.though have no economic revenue ,but for hosting
countries like China, it is enough  

time 6: 3'04

the boost of tourism has led some increase in the coutry's economy. but not so much.

the total revenue from the tourism  must take the outout to abroad into account ,not only for the input from abroad

zhangys

May 10
1.        The cost is 10 billion more than last 2 competitions combined. But the government argued that it was worth. And they earned the cost they’ve spent.
The analysis report is regarded as a political document. And economist think we should wait for years to see the actual effect.

2.        01:57
Tokyo became the next city to hold Olympic game. Its competitors are rejected for their special reasons: Spain is rejected because of its economy.
Why they are interested in holding the game? UK cost 20 billion when it first held the game, while china cost double of it. Although tourism could offset the cost, but those buildings built for the game are left.

01:48
Every city has its own reason to hold the game.
But the question is the president who apply the game will not pay for the debt.

00:41
Beijing show its strength by holding the game. Whether it’s time to say it’s worth or not after 5 years?

01:38
The tourist arrival decreased to normal level after the game, and those new stadiums became blank.

02:25
The game makes no economic benefit, but it could push a city to its limit. From this point of view, Beijing did it.

03:46
Brain’s economy bounced after holding the game. From the data, it shows the benefit in tourism plays a big part of it. But the data told foreign tourists’ spend in UK, but didn’t tell the spend English people pay abroad. Actually the difference kept the same.


3.        05:29
1)        The Russia will hold the next game.
The cost is not easy to estimate by former holders, which are emerging markets not like Russia. And these countries could benefit more from this event.
2)        Although it wouldn’t affect the national economy, it would affect the regional economy.
The cost plays a smaller part in those big countries; Holding the game would create new jobs.
3)        But the question is how to average the regional benefit.

ROLEDAD

[speaker]
it talks about the economic effects of the olympic games hold in london in 2012. most economists, by using a model to analysis, reach an agreement that this game is a great investment, which costs 15 billion pounds, and the payback actually is no that evident, even resulting in a great amount of debts.

[speed]
Time2: 1'48''
although tokyo successfully bid for hosting the 2020 olympic games, it will have to face the reality of great cost of this world's biggest party.

Time3: 1'42''
the public support usually takes up the most part of the source of expense, and this high-risk game usually has other particular intention, such as showing political power.
besides, politicians probably will be left worse between the biding time and the hosting time.

Warm up: 25''
raise the topic of the article: after five years, did the beijing olympic games  realize its original intention in economy?

Time4: 3'33''
in most olympic case, all hosts countries experience a surge in GDP in the years leading up to the event, due to the requisite massive capital investments, but figures go back to normal right after the Games.

Time5: 2'05''
the 2008 beijing olympic largely improved the air quality in bejing, and spread political influence in the world wide. however, hosting the olympics makes no economic sense.

Time6: 2'23''
although the unemployment was falling, the house price hit a record high, and economic output appeared to be growing in the last few months, which probably resulted from the 2012 london olympic games, actually, booming post-olympics tourism won't boost the economy as much as hoped.

[obstacle]5'47''
the accounting loss of the sochi 2014 olympic games is probably be one of the highest on record---a limited scope for creation of new employment, general great costs, and low real gross regional product increase.

盘腿大王

Time2[2’27]
Tokyo would host the 2020 Olympic games. Japan fended off not-especially-stiff competition from Madrid and Istanbul.
Nowadays hosting the games is a different business.

Time3[2’53]
Tokyo hopes the 2020 games can gee up Japan’s lacklustre economy.
It is a high-risk game. Rio’s hosting of the 2016 games had strong local support during the bidding process

Time4[2’43]
Can five years of time tell if it was all worth it in the end for China or was it just a lavish show of “face”?
China put a lot of soending on the Games,such as encironment programme,green space,stadiums and facilities.
Because of the tightened visa requirements,the increased tourist arrivalsduring the Games wasn’t immediately possible.

Time5[3’09]
Take a deep breath: the air quality problem still plagues Beijing today.
Spirit of the games: events like the Olympics have been downgraded from their lofty ideals to become political carrots.
Was it all worth it in the wnd:Hosting the Olympics makes no economic sense.But for the authorities face means everthing,that is enough.

Time6[3’15]
Booming post-Olympics tourism won’t boost the economy as much as hoped.

Time6[3’15]
Booming post-Olympics tourism won’t boost the economy as much as hoped.

香葱酱

Time 2 01:19
Time 3 01:23
Time 4 00:57
Time 5 02:10
Time 6 02:23
Obstacle 06:08

lilacrabbit

辛苦楼主

掌管 7        00:07:34.34        00:20:50.12
掌管 6        00:03:13.98        00:13:15.78
掌管 5        00:03:13.17        00:10:01.79
掌管 4        00:02:04.64        00:06:48.62
掌管 3        00:00:43.81        00:04:43.98
掌管 2        00:01:48.20        00:04:00.17
掌管 1        00:02:11.96        00:02:11.96