ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 7961|回复: 24
打印 上一主题 下一主题

天山4-36,没有问过的;都是手打,请NN们务必看看,一个星期考

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-1-10 01:27:00 | 只看该作者

天山4-36,没有问过的;都是手打,请NN们务必看看,一个星期考

关于选项A和E,做的时候是考虑了不少时间的,我选A答案E,理由如下:


首先认为E错,at the time that WIDC was opposing legislative attempts to restrict women's labor, WTUL had already ceased to do so; 这个so代表opposing legislative attempts to restrict women's labor,我觉得它没有不反对restrict women's labor,而是不反对不让女同胞们去那个鬼公司上班.


开始为A找理由,我们可以明确知道的,就是WIDC反对那个立法,而WTUL不反对; WIDC反对的原因正是restrict women's labor,这就代表了它默认了existing safety regulations were adequate to protect women's health,否则,她们怎么会忍心还让同胞们去鬼公司受罪呢? 而A选项后半句正是文中观点,WTUL认为现在的管制是不够的,需要加强!也就是立法是必要的.


都是手打,请NN们务必看看,一个星期考

沙发
发表于 2005-1-10 02:16:00 | 只看该作者

什么都看不到。楼主截图吧。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-1-10 02:29:00 | 只看该作者
地板
发表于 2005-1-10 13:15:00 | 只看该作者
能把题目帖住处来吗?
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-1-10 13:36:00 | 只看该作者
:
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-10 13:39:55编辑过]
6#
发表于 2005-1-10 23:50:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢帖出题目。



关于选项A和E,做的时候是考虑了不少时间的,我选A答案E,理由如下:


首先认为E错,at the time that WIDC was opposing legislative attempts to restrict women's labor, WTUL had already ceased to do so; 这个so代表opposing legislative attempts to restrict women's labor,我觉得它没有不反对restrict women's labor,而是不反对不让女同胞们去那个鬼公司上班.


开始为A找理由,我们可以明确知道的,就是WIDC反对那个立法,而WTUL不反对; WIDC反对的原因正是restrict women's labor,这就代表了它默认了existing safety regulations were adequate to protect women's health,否则,她们怎么会忍心还让同胞们去鬼公司受罪呢? 而A选项后半句正是文中观点,WTUL认为现在的管制是不够的,需要加强!也就是立法是必要的.


都是手打,请NN们务必看看,一个星期考


我认为,E选项正确,这个so代表opposing legislative attempts to restrict women's labor。整个选项的意思就是说,在WIDC反对这种限制妇女劳动的立法活动时,WTUL已经不再反对了。这与文章论述一致。至于楼主提出的“我觉得它没有不反对restrict women's labor,而是不反对不让女同胞们去那个鬼公司上班”。我认为WTUL是停止反对这种立法,而这种立法即限制了妇女就业。


A选项是与原文矛盾的。A的前半部分与原文是相反的,WIDC对安全规定现状也不满,这在文中明示。而A的后半部分虽然没有明示,但他们确实认为安全规定现状不理想,确实需要提高,但很难提高了。


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-11 0:12:06编辑过]
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-1-11 00:02:00 | 只看该作者
汗汗,谢谢你回答下下哈
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-1-12 01:07:00 | 只看该作者

顶~~!



[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-14 10:03:22编辑过]
9#
发表于 2005-2-27 00:35:00 | 只看该作者

    Acting on the recommen-

          dation of a British government

          committee investigating the

Line   high incidence in white lead

  (5)  factories of illness among

employees, most of whom

were women, the Home Sec-

retary proposed in 1895 that

Parliament enact legislation

(10)  that would prohibit women from

holding most jobs in white lead

factories. Although the

Women’s Industrial Defence

Committee (WIDC), formed

(15)  in 1892 in response to earlier

legislative attempts to restrict

women’s labor, did not dis-

count the white lead trade’s

potential health dangers, it

(20)  opposed the proposal, view-

          ing it as yet another instance

         of limiting women’s work

opportunities. Also opposing

the proposal was the Society

(25)  for Promoting the Employment

of Women (SPEW), which

attempted to challenge it by

investigating the causes of ill-

ness in white lead factories.

(30)  SPEW contended, and WIDC

concurred, that controllable

conditions in such factories

          were responsible for the devel-

opment of lead poisoning.

(35) SPEW provided convincing

evidence that lead poisoning

could be avoided if workers

were careful and clean and

         if already extant workplace

(40)  safety regulations were

stringently enforced. How-

ever, the Women’s Trade

Union League (WTUL), which

had ceased in the late 1880’s

(45)  to oppose restrictions on

women’s labor, supported the

eventually enacted proposal,

in part because safety regu-

lations were generally not

(50)  being enforced in white lead

factories, where there were no

unions (and little prospect of

any) to pressure employers to

comply with safety regulations.

Q35

The passage is primarily concerned with

               

  1. presenting various groups’ views of the motives of those proposing certain legislation
  2. contrasting the reasoning of various groups concerning their positions on certain proposed legislation
  3. tracing the process whereby certain proposed legislation was eventually enacted
  4. assessing the success of tactics adopted by various groups with respect to certain proposed legislation
  5. evaluating the arguments of various groups concerning certain proposed legislation

答案B, 我選A... 我怎麼也看不出contrast的意思在裡頭啊, 作者不是僅僅present而已嗎?

10#
发表于 2005-3-14 20:33:00 | 只看该作者
  1. presenting various groups’ views of the motives of those proposing certain legislation

错在present的只是观点,非motives。

个人意见。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-29 10:45
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部