- UID
- 259360
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2007-7-28
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
TPO 1 综合写作。第一次练习,我没怎么提passage的具体内容,这样可以吗? 请指教!如果贴这不合适,还请指出,谢谢!
The lecture contradicts the passage's point that giving employee an option to work a 4-day week will benefit the individual companies, the country and the employees who take the option.
First, the 4-day work option can not increase company profit. The company has to hire more people to fill the workload gap of the 4-day works. The costs for hiring more people would be as below: training cost, medical and housing benefits, more office spaces and more computers. All these would increase the company cost and hence reduce company profit.
Second, the 4-day work option can not guarantee more jobs generated and benefit the country in return. Hiring is time-consuming. The company may request the 4-day worker to do overtime work in order to meet the project timeline. Moreover, some company may expect a 4-day worker to finish the 5 days work within 4-days so that there is no need to hire more employees. As a whole, no more jobs are created.
Third, the 4-day work option put the option taker in risky situation of their career. Compared to 5-day worker, the 4-day worker's work ability is reasonably weaker. Consequently the 4-day worker will probably have less promotion opportunities because the company would like to have a 5-day work manager to cover the full-time company operations. |
|