ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 9386|回复: 27
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-3-15

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-1-8 05:12:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-3-15

Q12 to Q15:


      In its 1903 decision in the case


       of Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, the United


       States Supreme Court rejected the


Line       efforts of three Native American tribes


  (5)      to prevent the opening of tribal lands


to non-Indian settlement without tribal


consent.  In his study of the Lone


Wolf case, Blue Clark properly


emphasizes the Court’s assertion


(10)      of a virtually unlimited unilateral power


of Congress (the House of Represen-


tatives and the Senate) over Native


American affairs.  But he fails to note


the decision’s more far-reaching


(15)      impact:  shortly after Lone Wolf, the


federal government totally abandoned


negotiation and execution of formal


written agreements with Indian tribes


as a prerequisite for the implemen-


(20)      tation of federal Indian policy.  Many


commentators believe that this change


had already occurred in 1871 when—


following a dispute between the


       House and the Senate over which


(25)      chamber should enjoy primacy in


Indian affairs—Congress abolished


the making of treaties with Native


American tribes.  But in reality the


federal government continued to nego-


(30)      tiate formal tribal agreements past


the turn of the century, treating these


documents not as treaties with sover-


       eign nations requiring ratification by the


Senate but simply as legislation to be


(35)      passed by both houses of Congress.


       The Lone Wolf decision ended this


era of formal negotiation and finally


did away with what had increasingly


become the empty formality of obtain-


ing tribal consent.



Q15:


According to the passage, which of the following resulted from the Lone Wolf decision?




  • The Supreme Court took on a greater role in Native American affairs.

  • Native American tribes lost their legal standing as sovereign nations in their dealings with the federal government, but their ownership of tribal lands was confirmed.

  • The federal government no longer needed to conclude a formal agreement with a Native American tribe in order to carry out policy decisions that affected the tribe.

  • The federal government began to appropriate tribal lands for distribution to non-Indian settlers.

  • Native American tribes were no longer able to challenge congressional actions by appealing to the Supreme Court.

  • 答案给的是E,但是我觉得选C,因为E里面说的什么“TRIBES以后都不能想SUPREME COURT起诉了”我觉得文中没有提到呀,反而C比较好一点。他说的是“以后政府在制定关于NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBE的时候不再需要把TRIBE算在内了,不是吗?欢迎讨论!


    沙发
     楼主| 发表于 2005-1-8 14:30:00 | 只看该作者

    大家帮帮忙,好吗?感激不尽了。。。。

    板凳
    发表于 2005-1-11 00:50:00 | 只看该作者

    C在文章中没有这种内容,应理解为无。

    E则是可推导出的斩钉截铁的事实。

    地板
    发表于 2005-1-23 05:28:00 | 只看该作者

    the decision's more far-reaching  impact:  shortly after Lone Wolf, the federal government totally abandoned negotiation and execution of formal written agreements with Indian tribes as a prerequisite for the implementation of federal Indian policy.

    个人认为这句话就是文中所支持的结果,即C所述内容同义变换。

    E虽可推出,但文中并没有直接写明,因此,E比C弱

    5#
    发表于 2005-7-25 14:13:00 | 只看该作者
    E太绝对了,C更好。
    6#
    发表于 2005-7-25 14:16:00 | 只看该作者

    参看最后一段:


    The Lone Wolf decision ended this


    era of formal negotiation and finally


    did away with what had increasingly


    become the empty formality of obtain-


    ing tribal consent.

    7#
    发表于 2005-8-28 14:58:00 | 只看该作者
    同意swlfx~!
    8#
    发表于 2005-10-2 21:39:00 | 只看该作者
    the GWD 3 version i got, Q15's answer is C not E
    9#
    发表于 2005-10-5 16:39:00 | 只看该作者

    c,the best answer.

    10#
    发表于 2005-10-5 18:18:00 | 只看该作者
    是C
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 03:38
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部