|
下面这道逻辑题目，我看了答案还是不懂，大牛帮帮忙,解释解释怎么整这种题？ 18.in interviews with jurors inquiring how they arrived at their verdicts, researchers found that 40% of the references jourors made were to factors that had not been included in courtroom testimony. to improve the jury system, the researchers suggested that judges give instructions to the jury at the beginning of a trial rather than at the end. they argued that this would permit jurors to concentrate on the most relevant evidence rather than filling in gaps with their own assumptions, which have little to do with the legality of a case. question: the answer to which of the following questions is LEAST directly relevant to evaluating the researchers' suggestion above? A. is it possible for a judge to instruct a jury at the end of a trial in such a way that jurors will disregard any irrelevant factors that had been using to weigh the evidence? B.will a jury that hears a judge's instruction at the beginning of a trial be able to weigh the evidence accordingly once that evidence has actualy been presented? C.will having judges give instructions at the beginning of a trial rather than at the end significantly alter the customary procedures employed by the judicial system? D. when jurors are queried as to how they arrived at their verdicts, does their interpretation of their decision-making process include many references to factors that were not, in fact, influential? E. if jurors hear the judge's instructions at the beginning of a trial, what percetage of the factors that influence their decisions will be matters that were not presented in the evidence? | 
[复制链接]
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2007-12-3 21:53:00
