ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5208|回复: 15
打印 上一主题 下一主题

头疼ing,唉!!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-7-17 18:44:00 | 只看该作者

头疼ing,唉!!

1、Which of the following best completes the passage below?
Sales campaigns aimed at the faltering personal computer market have strongly emphasized ease of use, called user-friendliness. This emphasis is oddly premature and irrelevant in the eyes of most potential buyers, who are trying to address the logically prior issue of whether_________________________.
A. user-friendliness also implies that owners can service their own computers.
B. personal computers cost more the more user-friendly thry are
C. currently available models are user-friendly enough to suit them
D. the people promoting personal computers use them in their own homes
E. they have enough sensible uses for a personal computer to justify the expense of buying one.
答案是:E
啥意思!!没搞懂!!!
2、Recent estimates predict that between 1982 and 1995 the greatest increase in the number of people employed will be in the category of low-paying service occupations. This category, however, will not increase its share of total employment, wheras the category of high-paying service occupations will increase its share.
If the estimates above are accurate, which of the following conclusions can be drawn
A. In 1982  more people were working in low-paying service occupations than were working in high-paying service occupations.
B. In 1995 more people will be working in high-paying service occupations than will be working in low-paying service occupations.
C. Nonservice occupations will account for the same share of total employment in 1995 as in 1982
D. Many of the people who were working in low-paying service occupations in 1982 will be working in high-paying service occupations by 1995
E. The rate of growth for low-paying service occupations will be greater than the overall rate of employment growth between 1982 and 1995
不懂!!一碰到这样的关系题就晕了!!
注:因为我实在是找不到两道题在gamt中的出处,所以未注。见谅!!
沙发
发表于 2003-7-17 19:40:00 | 只看该作者
1. logically prior issue = sensible uses
2. This is the kind of question about the relationship between ratio and quantitity. Honestly, it's Maths problem which you do well in! Try again!
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-7-17 19:54:00 | 只看该作者
没懂!!烦躁,知道兔兔逻辑不行还写的这么简单。我达不到你的境界,哭ing!!详细点呗

以下是引用siebel在2003-7-17 19:40:00的发言:
1. logically prior issue = sensible uses

地板
发表于 2003-7-17 20:20:00 | 只看该作者
这种题,偶只会用排除法。mm那个选项排除不了?

题意:结论:潜在的客户,关心的是电脑的logically prior issue(不会翻译,感觉肯定是userfriendly的反面)。其他几个选项都没说明这个logically prior issue是什么冬冬。ABC说的还是USERFRIENDLY。

偶是模糊猜选的啊。。。
5#
发表于 2003-7-17 22:21:00 | 只看该作者
我的看法
第一题的“the logically prior issue ”大概相当于“逻辑先决问题”的意思。
这个题目是大概意思是:“一个销售活动可以提供给潜在用户一些电脑使用的简易,也叫用户友好的使用。但是这对于用户来说是不成熟的,因为这些用户提出了一个逻辑先决问题:是否他们对合理的PC的使用有足够的判断力。”---如果有,则销售活动毫无意义。如果没有,活动才是有价值的。
6#
发表于 2003-7-17 22:35:00 | 只看该作者
第二题
是考虑增加数和基数以及比例的关系
低收入的增量最大,比例不便,则说明其基数也最大。
7#
发表于 2003-7-17 22:36:00 | 只看该作者
选A
8#
发表于 2003-7-18 04:24:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用pony在2003-7-17 22:21:00的发言:
我的看法
第一题的“the logically prior issue ”大概相当于“逻辑先决问题”的意思。


nod nod
9#
发表于 2003-7-18 05:21:00 | 只看该作者
”the logically prior issue“我认为是:“逻辑上优先考虑的问题“。本题pony翻译得很好,我不重复了。作为computer背景的,我举个生活中的例子:就像dell,提出了easy as dell的口号。但是大部分的潜在顾客,可能并不关注使用方便的问题,对他们来说:他们优先考虑的是他们值不值得花这么多的钱去买这些功能,甚至是买这台电脑。比如“一键上网”,要加200块钱,顾客明显不感兴趣。
10#
发表于 2003-7-18 05:23:00 | 只看该作者
忘了说了,e选项没错,我认为。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-23 01:57
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部