求大神解决！马上要考试了！急啊！！！！！！！！！

yd0329

Excavations of the Roman city of Sepphoris have uncovered numerous detailed mosaics depicting several readily identifiable animal species: a hare, a partridge, and various Mediterranean fish. Oddly, most of the species represented did not live in the Sepphoris region when these mosaics were created. Since identical motifs appear in mosaics found in other Roman cities, however, the mosaics of Sepphoris were very likely created by traveling artisans from some other part of the Roman Empire.

逻辑：S城的挖掘发现了很多详细的图案，描绘了很多物种；（转折），当时这些物种并不存在于S城→由于相似的图案出现在其他城市，S城的图案很可能是来自其他地方的旅行artisans创造的

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The Sepphoris mosaics are not composed exclusively of types of stones found naturally in the Sepphoris area.

B. There is no single region to which all the species depicted in the Sepphoris mosaics are native.

C. No motifs appear in the Sepphoris mosaics that do not also appear in the mosaics of some other Roman city.

D. All of the animal figures in the Sepphoris mosaics are readily identifiable as representations of known species.

E. There was not a common repertory of mosaic designs with which artisans who lived in various parts of the Roman Empire were familiar.

---

完全不懂选项的逻辑关系

正确答案是E

houhaibo528

个人认为是C，问题出在Oddly, most of the ...

yd0329

正确答案是E。根本看不懂！

enkyklios

我认为
1；因为本地不产这种东西，所以本地人创作不出来，
2；如果是另外一个城市的人创作出来的话，应该有common ……
正是基于这两点理由，它才得出来是一个旅行的艺术家创作的，