- UID
- 714736
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-1-28
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
地板

楼主 |
发表于 2013-8-18 12:02:57
|
只看该作者
昨天昨天的:8.17 independent::
School always collect information of the teaching performance of teachers and according to it, give teacher who has efficient teaching rewards.
So which is more useful: evaluation by students or by other teachers?
Time: 1h30mins
W: 额, 791w
As the level of employees in a company can, to large extent, reflect the height the company will achieve, the standard of teachers in a school also decide the rank the school locates. Accordingly, a suitable assessment system will be indispensable and play an essential role to supervise the performance of a teacher. Based on this, so, who should form a team to evaluate teachers, students or other teachers? I would rather to achieve a complete assessment from both if possible, but considering the limitation of time, cost and energy, I cannot agree more the point that students will be the best judger.
Undeniably, teacher’s work is to deliver knowledge to students. Whether they did a good job or just make a teaching process perfunctorily, students are those who know teachers best. Compared to the other teachers, firstly, students spend longer with their teachers. During the class, students can attention the whole methods of teaching of a certain teacher. In extracurricular time, through asking for help about some problems, not only can student know the teacher’s knowledge level, but they can notice whether the teacher is responsible for students or just deal with his/her single teaching job in class, which is not the meaning of true education. Taking one of my high school teachers, Mr. Lee as an instance, no one will deny that he really does a good job inside classroom—he always prepares a particular subject material and learning case for every class. However, every time when students go to his office for asking for extensive questions, either he will refuse or has not ability to answer them. How can students give him a high score based on that? Moreover, different communication content formed among teachers or between students and teachers also determines the necessary of evaluation from students. Under most circumstances, the communication in teachers is just some trivial topics or colleague chats, which cannot be regarded as an important part to assess a teacher.
Besides, the evaluation from students will be more objective than that from other teachers, considering the potential relationship between them. Obviously, the relevance between students and teachers is more pure—teaching and being taught simply say, while among teachers, just as employees in a company, is totally complicated. In more cases, clique may as well be formed and intense competitive relationship will exert a decisive influence when evaluating. It cannot be eliminated that if a teacher is competing a professor position with another teacher, he definitely will score that teacher as low as possible, yet this kind of situation is ill-persuasive and can demonstrate nothing except that the two teachers is under a competitive relationship. Let me make this point deeper. The competitive relationship is mutual, which leads that another teacher also will evaluate his/her opponent subjectively. The result is that the assessment forms from the two teachers are invalid. Worse, the most important thing is that we do not know the specific relationship in the teacher network. Therefore, marking among teachers will be subjective, infeasible and unreliable.
Some people, admittedly, could refute that students might produce unjust appraise to teachers when the teachers’ teaching method is unpalatable for himself/herself. I concede that this kind of situation is in all probability, after all, it cannot be evitable in consideration of various characteristics and habits from different students. However, it is popularization of teaching method of a teacher that should be treated as a vital part of assessing. Based on the huge amount of students, if teacher has an applicable and popular method to most students, it is impossible that his score from students is low. In contrast, an under-average remark just can illustrate his poor teaching horizon. In addition, it seems that students will easily get influence or be credulous to others’ suggestion. From my point of view, in comparison with these among teachers, this condition will occur in an extremely low probability and the colossal amount of students will readily rectify that from statistics angle.
Another thing I will suggest to consider is that the age of students. Namely, different level school should adopt different measures to conduct this assessment job. Primary school, where students just the children during their 6 – 13 years old, had better let teachers assistant students to finish remarks. Yet, in university or college, it will be a taboo if teachers are ongoing any interference in the whole process of remarking.
In retrospection, since the communication between students and teachers is more valid regarding to evaluating the education level of a teacher, students’ assessment is more objective and the colossal quantity of students will avoid statistics error, I strongly hold the opinion that a teacher’s performance which is concerned about efficient teaching rewards should be finished by students.
额,原来我是个话唠。。,。又多了。。麻烦咯!!
lyslj001童鞋,要不要来这篇啊?哈哈。,。 |
|