sallygreen的T作文文 before 0825

olivekola

sally~~~我来看你了~~~加油加油！！！！

19911006

olivekola 发表于 2013-8-22 22:06
sally~~~我来看你了~~~加油加油！！！！

考拉居然出现了

sallygreen

olivekola 发表于 2013-8-22 22:06
sally~~~我来看你了~~~加油加油！！！！

感动哎~有你的加油我一定会超长发挥哒！！！

sallygreen

8.21 integrated
TPO 15
咦~听得不太好

The reading and thelecture both discuss restriction of cane toad in Australia, which is brought tothe country for the original sake of protecting crops, yet failing. The readingpassage gives credence to three possible solutions of dealing with that problem.The lecture, however, points to the inappropriaties in each of three methods,directly challenging the reading passage.

First and foremost, theprofessor contradicts the issue of establishing a national fence to keep canetoads in case of they spreading into other uncolonized area. He says that toadscould be limited inside the fence, while they can leave their eggs or young toadsoutsides leading that toad may not be restricted by the fence. The reading,however, declares that according the the previous similar example regarding torestriction of rabbit, the fence building will be effective and efficient inthe aspect of limitation of animals.

It is mentioned in thepassage that Australia can recruit some volunteers to capture the exoticharmful animal, cane toad, considering the easiness of catching and findinglocation. But the professor demurs about the idea. According to him, thesevolunteer will be untrained. He points out that taking this measure is just towaste resource and cast no effect on the very problem.

The issue of adoptingdisease-causing virus does not please the professor either. The professoracknowledges a certain kind of virus could control popularization and growth ofcane toads but also point out that it is a definitely terrible idea for thistrouble. As he says, the variable virus will get to other place over the originalregion.

In conclusion, thereading strongly believes that these three solutions are feasile and effectiveto treat with the problem; however, the professor reveals the flaws andprovides his own proofs of this very fact.

sallygreen

8.21 independent

父母應該多陪孩子玩遊戲或體育運動，還是陪孩子做和學校學習有關的事情？

Education issue as a heatedly discussed issue has risen controversy in modern society development. Parents are the first teacher of their children. Hence that assist children to chase the beacon in the mist is obligated for parents. In the process of family education, should parents pay more attention to extracurricula or subject-related help is crucial for the effectiveness and the final success of their children. Frankly, I prone to stand in the side of parents concentrating on comprehensive health of children mentally and physically. Necessary and appropriated seems the option that parents better spend more time on playing with their children.

Important as school education is, teachers are more professional and they are responsible for that. There is indisputable that teacher will deliver proper knowledge and key points to children according to their current situation and level, which is more conductive to them compared to parents. Probably, some people would regard parents as auxiliary character for teacher. That is to say, parents would, as supervisors, monitor and encourage children to conduct study activities and finish their assignments. Undeniably, I concede that rational seems the function of parents from the perspective of school performance, but in the long-term development for children, I suggest parents be role as children’s friends.

Admittedly, true education is not equal to the score at school, a number which can just represent recent class performance or temporary degree of grasping key points. True education is to facilitate an understanding of oneself, and tolerance and respect for the viewpoints of others. It is the true education that will help children to be successful. Obviously, this kind of overall quality could be formed through playing games or do some practice, which can cultivate children’s team spirit, creative thinking and success-oriented motivation. A research from my university demonstrates that firstly, there is no absolute relationship between the time of studying they devote on and the grade they get in final exam. Namely, when parents spend their and children’s leisure time on urging them to study in the purpose of getting a good score, it may be counterproductive. And the second consequence from our research is that those successful people who achieve or almost achieve their life goal are not be supervised to study all the time by their parents, by contrast, parents, in most case, encourage them to do physical exercise or play games. Tracing the possible reasons causing the phenomenon, I would believe that children will be exploited brains, enhanced intelligence and trained critical thinking in the process of doing sports, particularly taking a match.

On the other hand, children will produce dependent psychology to parents if being helped or accompanied too much by parents. Caught by such assistance state, children will be accustomed to ask for help instead of thinking over a problem by their own at first, causing they being lack of capability to figure out questions.

Finally, time allocation of parents spend on their children plays a vital role on children’s studying or even future careers in that a good or bad characteristic which can be formed in assistance of parents will exert a far-reaching influence on children’s whole life.

sallygreen

ni_kate 发表于 2013-8-22 18:14
综合完成，还木有改
http://forum.chasedream.com/thread-870746-1-1.html

改完啦! 求批改~

sallygreen

olivekola 发表于 2013-8-22 22:06
sally~~~我来看你了~~~加油加油！！！！

kola帮人家改一篇吧~
8.21那个独立好么，么了个么么哒