GWD-2-11

lulushi

GWD-2-Question 11:

Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives.  However, since there are several wine makers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce, people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these wine makers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A.        These wine makers have been able to duplicate the preservative effect produced by adding sulfites by means that do not involve adding any potentially allergenic substances to their wine.

B.        Not all forms of sulfite are equally likely to produce the allergic reactions.

C.        Wine is the only beverage to which sulfites are commonly added.

D.       Apart from sulfites, there are no substances commonly present in wine that give rise to an allergic reaction.

E.        Sulfites are not naturally present in the wines produced by these wine makers in amounts large enough to produce an allergic reaction in someone who drinks these wines.

答案是D，可我认为改E，not加WEKEN型，原题中特别强调对sulfites.过敏。E中，如果 Sulfites 天然存在酒里，那些喝了没有人工添加的，一样要过敏。D的范围太大，没有E贴近原题。

不知我理解对否，请指教

kingsoft

      i think the right answer is E

      conclusion of this argument discussed the allergic reaction to sulfites but not the the allergic reaction to other substance

      thus D has no bearing on the conclusion

fiona_hq

o~