OG13 CR78求指导~~~

stephaniew

78.In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustanined in automobile accidents,reprorts of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered. Presently,no objective test for whiplash exists, so it is true that spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily indentified.Nevertheless,these facts do not warrant the conclusion drawn by some commentors that in the countries with highter rates of reported wiplash injuries,half of the reported cases is spurious.Clearly,in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for wiplash,people often have little incentive to report wiplash injuries that they actually have suffered.

In the argument given,the two boldface portion play which of the following roles?
A.The first is a claim that the argument disputes;the second is a conclusion that has been based on the claim.
B.The first is a claim that has been uesd to support a conclusion that the argument accepts;the second is that conclusion.
C.The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion for which the argument provides further evidence;the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
D.The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument;the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implication from that finding.
E.The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument;the second is evidence presented to establish that the finding is accurate.

我不懂的是,these facts do not warrant the conclusion drawn by some commentors that in the countries with highter rates of reported wiplash injuries这句话说事实不能为commentors的conclusion提供正当的理由，又说half of the reported cases is spurious,我就不明白了，这个argument到底是说commentors的conclusion是真的还是假的

答案是D，但是og中对A的第一个boldfaced portion解释是the claim made in the first boldfaced portion is never diputed.但是D答案里说the first is a finding whose implication are at issue in the argument.这两个好矛盾，是不是跟一个是claim一个是finding有关呢？
对E的第一个解释是the accuracy of the fisrt boldfaced portion is never questioned in the argument,但是these facts do not warrant the conclusion drawn by some commentors that in the countries with highter rates of reported wiplash injuries,half of the reported cases is spurious这不是对第一个boldfaced的accuracy的question吗？

这个题看的我好一头雾水啊，跪请各位大神指点迷津！

stephaniew

求大神指点啊~~~~~

stephaniew

求指点啊求指点~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

llmmlemon

不是大虾，尝试解答下：

COMMENTOR的CONCLUSION是that in the countries with highter rates of reported wiplash injuries,half of the reported cases is spurious。THAT引导两个从句，而不只是逗号前的部分。所以，COMMENTOR的观点是一半的索赔是伪造的，但作者认为由FACTS不能得出这个结论。

第一个BF就是FACTS本身，无论作者还是COMMENTOR都认可这个FACTS，只是双方对其的解释不一样（即其含义有争议）。COMMENTOR认为原因在于，在有该保险项目的国家，一半索赔是伪造的，而作者认为（第二个BF）原因在于，在没有该保险项目的国家，人们几乎没有动机报告这种事故。

stephaniew

llmmlemon 发表于 2013-8-12 19:29
不是大虾，尝试解答下：

COMMENTOR的CONCLUSION是that in the countries with highter rates of reported  ...

谢谢！一下明白了。

zincgirl

thanks a lot!

joannahope

llmmlemon 发表于 2013-8-12 19:29
不是大虾，尝试解答下：

COMMENTOR的CONCLUSION是that in the countries with highter rates of reported  ...

额。。。看你的解释我是懂了一点 但是关于CR 很多题我分不清哪些是作者的观点哪些是作者的结论，这个然我很苦恼有时候我还以为是结论 可是最后发现OG上的解释说作者只是给了观点，这个区分具体应该怎样看尼 希望指点