求助！！PREP08 CR #111

带阿咪阿毛读phd

小二郎的兄弟 发表于 2016-7-8 18:03
这道题也是纠结了几分钟。。为积攒人品给后人看吧~

这个题目的 逻辑是：K现在执行的是high tariff来保证n ...

卧槽看了好几遍终于看懂了 感谢

Charline_chang

小二郎的兄弟 发表于 2016-7-8 18:03
这道题也是纠结了几分钟。。为积攒人品给后人看吧~

这个题目的 逻辑是：K现在执行的是high tariff来保证n ...

本题的结论是：取消关税会增加城市的失业率，问削弱。
所以不应该是 取消关税，对城市的失业率不会增加？
E答案 如果不取消关税，农民进入城市，城市的失业率上升了，也就是说，如果取消了关税，农民不进入城市，城市的失业率不会增加，所以削弱了结论。

jade77

Vivian1091 发表于 2013-8-4 10:16
结论：remove the tariff would not increase the unemployment rate in urban取消关税不会增加城市失业率
...

不是问的削弱结论吗

Bensontuo

1. Spot the question type - If " one of the following Option " must be true, then the " original argument must be false or could be true but not must be true.

2. If " original argument must be true ", then " one of the following options " must be false.

P1: K put high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts to ensure that nuts are sold to domestic process plants.

High tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew ---> Nuts sold to domestic

Nut does not sold to domestic ---> No high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew

P2: If the tariff were lifted ( removed ) and If unprocessed cashews sold at world market place, more farmers could profit by growing cashews.

No High tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew + Nut does not sold to domestic ---> Farmer could be profit by growing cashews.

P1 + p2

Nut does not sold to demotic ---> No high tariff + Nut sold to world market ---> Farmer could be profit


C: However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government's effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next 5 years

Processing plants ---> Urban Areas ---> removing tariff ---> Serious hamper the gov's efforts to reduce the urban unemployment.

Processing plants are all in urban areas ---> Removing tariff ---> farmer profit ---> Hamper the efforts

The core of the argument " Removing tariffs ---> Cash sold at world market ---> farmer profit ---> hamper the efforts of gov on reducing the unemployments, since no cashew to process at processing plants.

so, if there is one answer showing any mistaken negate within any part of the conditional logic of original argument,  then the whole logic chain must be destroyed. if it could be destroyed, then it would be weaken answer we are looking for.

A. there is no any cashews left for processing at the processed plants, since they are sold to world market, if they are all sold to world market instead of domestic market, how could we have any " some of the by-products of processing cashew exist.

B. So ?out of scope, we are talking about what would be happened in K, not the other countries.


C. it could only prove that more farmer could be benefited,  but does not mean the efforts from the gov would be no use.

D. again, its not relevant to the core argument.

E no profitable crops ---> Farmer no profit ---> move into city.

( Here is the most important point !!!!   Original argument said, removing tariffs will fail the efforts; however, the reason why the efforts are failed is not because tariffs being removed, but might be because farmers who can't make enough money come to the city.



* Its not about whether the conclusion of the argument could be overturned or not, it's about " the process of reasoning structure ".  ( Removing tariffs ---> Hamper government's effort )  as the original argument, you don't want to refute the conclusion by selecting the answer suggesting that " efforts won't be hampered; instead, you want to look for the one that suggesting why removing tariffs is not sufficient enough to guarantee the gov's efforts being hampered.

Let us double check the contrapositive of P2 => Farmer makes no profit ----> No remove the tariffs or keep selling to the domestic market

And option E => Farmer makes no profit ---> Farmer moving into the city.

So, " No remove the tariffs or keeping selling to the domestic market ---> Farmer moving into the city.

and if farmer moving into the city, then the increased base of the population might be the reason why gov's efforts are hampered, but not the other factor of processing plants, locating in urban areas requires to downsize the operational works, since there are no enough cashew to process to make profit which would result in gov's effort of reducing unemployment rate.

你这一天天

yanhang 发表于 2014-1-1 05:45
原来的假设：增加关税，cashew只供应国内，而让城市里的processing plants增加，从而政府减少 ...

同意！