ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1001|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助贴~~希望大家帮帮看一下啦

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-5-16 21:22:34 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式

Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recentsharp increases in the population of snow geese, which breed in the Arctic andare displacing birds of less vigorous species. Although snow geese are apopular quarry for hunters in the southern regions where they winter, thehunting season ends if and when hunting has reduced the population by fivepercent, according to official estimates. Clearly, dropping this restrictionwould allow the other species to recover.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

A Hunting limits for snowgeese were imposed many years ago in response to a sharp decline in thepopulation of snow geese.

B It has been many yearssince the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closedearlier than the scheduled date.

C The number of snow geesetaken by hunters each year has grown every      year for several years.

D As their population hasincreased, snow geese have recolonized wintering grounds thatthey had not used for several seasons.

E In the snow goose'swinter habitats, the goose faces no significant natural predation.


答案是B。。。可以接受吧。。。我想问下C为什么不对呢?The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every      year for several years.说明每年被捕的SG逐年增多,而这又占SG总数量的5%,说明SG总数量也在逐年增多啊,说明其他物种不能recover,C不是可以削弱么?
求指导,求吐槽~

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-5-16 23:39:05 | 只看该作者
结论是“dropping this restriction would allow the other species to recover.”
restriction保护了snow geese的数量,而snow geese反过来会对其他种类产生威胁,因此推出restriction可以保护其他种类。
但是要注意题干中说的是birds are threatened by recent sharp increases in the population of snow geese,B选项中明确指出restriction已经实施多年。但是是最近的increase对其他物种造成了威胁。所以restriction与最近的增长无关,因而不能保护其他物种。
C选项中,只说了snow geese的数量增长,只是重复了题干条件recent sharp increases in the population of snow geese,并不能对restriction的作用造成了最近的increase起到否定作用,因此无法削弱。
板凳
发表于 2013-5-17 08:57:40 | 只看该作者
我想讨论一下这道题的思路:因为问题是那个选项可以“undermines the argument”。
那么:
第一步:Augument是什么:restriction可以起作用
第二步:找出与“restriction不能起作用”相关的选项
C选项是一个客观现状,与restriction所起的作用毫无关系。
B选项:restriction早就对population不起作用了,形同虚设。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2013-5-17 12:01:40 | 只看该作者
maestri 发表于 2013-5-17 08:57
我想讨论一下这道题的思路:因为问题是那个选项可以“undermines the argument”。
那么:
第一步:Augumen ...

非常感谢,有点明白了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-22 13:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部