- UID
- 4864
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2003-5-28
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
[求助]从xdf的一个passage看阅读题的做题思路
Passage 2 Woodrow Wilson was referring to the liberal idea of the economic market when he said that the free enterprise system is the most efficient economic system. Maximum freedom means (5) maximum productiveness; our “openness” is to be the measure of our stability. Fascination with this ideal has made Americans defy the “Old World” categories of settled possessiveness versus unsettling deprivation, the cupidity of retention (10) versus the cupidity of seizure, a “status quo” defended or attacked. The United States, it was believed, had no status quo ante. Our only “sta- tion” was the turning of a stationary wheel, spin- ning faster and faster. We did not base our (15) system on property but opportunity---which meant we based it not on stability but on mobil- ity. The more things changed, that is, the more rapidly the wheel turned, the steadier we would be. The conventional picture of class politics is (20) composed of the Haves, who want a stability to keep what they have, and the Have-Nots, who want a touch of instability and change in which to scramble for the things they have not. But Americans imagined a condition in which spec- (25) ulators, self-makers, runners are always using the new opportunities given by our land. These eco- nomic leaders (front-runners) would thus he mainly agents of change. The nonstarters were considered the ones who wanted stability, a (30) strong referee to give them some position in the race, a regulative hand to calm manic specula- tion; an authority that can call things to a halt, begin things again from compensatorily stag- gered “starting lines.” (35) “Reform” in America has been sterile because it can imagine no change except through the extension of this metaphor of a race, wider inclu- sion of competitors, “a piece of the action,” as it were, for the disenfranchised. There is no (40) attempt to call off the race. Since our only sta- bility is change, America seems not to honor the quiet work that achieves social interdependence and stability. There is, in our legends, no hero- ism of the office clerk, no stable industrial work (45) force of the people who actually make the system work. There is no pride in being an employee (Wilson asked for a return to the time when everyone was an employer). There has been no boasting about our social workers---they are (50) merely signs of the system’s failure, of opportu- nity denied or not taken, of things to be elimi- nated. We have no pride in our growing interdependence, in the fact that our system can serve others, that we are able to help those in (55) need; empty boasts from the past make us ashamed of our present achievements, make us try to forget or deny them, move away from them. There is no honor but in the Wonderland race we must all run, all trying to win, none (60) winning in the end (for there is no end).
以上是XDF63篇阅读中的第二篇,看了好几遍都摸不着头脑,郁闷ing,请各位XDJM以此题为例指教一下阅读思路![/face]
问题: 看了花儿的阅读总结,说是每篇文章的第一段必须详读,以后每一段的段首第一句要详读,文章结尾的最后一句也要详读,可是就上面那篇passage来看,一共才两段,而且每一段都是巨长无比,按花儿的办法详读第一段、做笔记,第二段差不多也算详读了,每句句子分开看都能看懂,可是合成一篇文章之后就不知所云了。
1.就上面这篇文章来看,作者的观点在哪里体现? 2.文中所用的比喻,如runner、referee之类的跟观点有什么关系?或者说如何来说明观点? 3.文章的第一、第二段之间是什么关系? 4.第二段中哪句话是总结作者观点的? 5.这类文章应该怎么读? 6.考试中短文章一般多少行?长文章一般多少行?象上面这个passage从难度上看是难,还是易?
 |
|