天山-9-11,12

tangzimo

以下是引用华籍美人在2005-6-17 22:03:00的发言：

偶12题开始也选错了，当时选了E，关键是受了原文中的could be easily be reinvested in old-style eco-inefficient industries这句话的影响，但是又没有看到easily这个词，而E说 is unlikely to是过于绝对化了，容易被再投资于old style, inefficient 的东东,并不能说明company不会去投资creative and new efficient的东东，当时没有考虑到

看了wangyu73cn的分析，后来发现确实应该是B，

由于use and discard可能会造成waste,而products的增加，可能会增加这种use and discard从而造成waste, may 的使用非常得体，ETS 的阅读的答案通常是客观而不走极端的

明！

12题的B还有个may，只是说可能允许。

果然：）

lachance

以下是引用wwwhahchn在2005-9-17 15:37:00的发言：

12题我觉得B不对，B的定位在这句话：

Such innovations reduce production waste but do not alter the number
of products manufactured nor the waste generated from their use and discard

不改变number并不能推出number变大啊

A的定位在这句话：

Moreover, there is no guarantee that increased economic growth from ecoefficiency will come in similarly ecoefficient ways, since in today’s global markets, greater profits may be turned
into investment capital that could easily be reinvested in old-style eco-inefficient industries.

A就是对上面这句话的改写，further没问题吧，表示“更多的”，跟similarly没什么冲突，更何况前面还有no guarantee

支持A

A选项怎么感觉因果颠倒了呀

1. Company profits resulting from such innovations may be reinvested in that company with no guarantee that the company will continue to make further improvements in ecoefficiency.  

Moreover, there is no guarantee that increased economic growth from ecoefficiency will come in similarly ecoefficient ways, since in today’s global markets, greater profits may be turned
into investment capital that could easily be reinvested in old-style eco-inefficient industries.

还是NN们说的B好

twang1981

１２的Ｂ可以从以下两个定位点得出：

 Peter Senge and Goran Carstedt see this development as laudable but suggest that simply adopting ecoefficiency innovations could actually worsen environmental stresses in the future.

Even a vastly more ecoefficient industrial system could, were it to grow much larger, generate more total waste and destroy more habitat and species than would a smaller, less ecoefficient economy.

sicivi

以下是引用twang1981在2008-6-26 21:46:00的发言：

１２的Ｂ可以从以下两个定位点得出：

 Peter Senge and Goran Carstedt see this development as laudable but suggest that simply adopting ecoefficiency innovations could actually worsen environmental stresses in the future.

Even a vastly more ecoefficient industrial system could, were it to grow much larger, generate more total waste and destroy more habitat and species than would a smaller, less ecoefficient economy.

对！

要注意B里面的“Company growth fostered ...”,所以不能跟Such innovations reduce production waste but do not alter the number
去定位，而是Twang1981引用的第二句话。

osennheiser

可能跟容易是两个概念
easily=/=likely

看来看去我都成了墙头草了.11题我觉得应该选D, 虽然我开始选错了C.但是要说答案是E的话..打死也不服..文中根本找不到能跟E对得上的地方..
12题.真是好难分清楚, 到现在还不清楚,有没有NN出来给一下让我这个白痴也能看懂的解释呢
另外: 回15楼的美人的"偶12题开始也选错了，当时选了E，关键是受了原文中的could be easily be reinvested in old-style eco-inefficient industries这句话的影响，但是又没有看到easily这个词，而E说 is unlikely to是过于绝对化了，"  
un?like?ly
1not likely to happen
Donna might be able to come tomorrow, but it's very unlikely .
unlikely to do something
The weather is unlikely to improve over the next few days.
it is unlikely (that)
It's unlikely that the thieves will be caught.
in the unlikely event of something (=if something which is unlikely happens) In the unlikely event of a fire, passengers should move to the top deck.
2
an unlikely place, person, or thing is strange and not what you would expect
The quiet village of Brockhampton was an unlikely setting for such a crime.
3
not likely to be true
an unlikely story
英汉双解的朗文里也说的是"未必可能的,不大可能的.未必会发生的'这哪里有说到绝对呢..只是不太可能,又不是绝不可能..
谈不上绝对化吧...

-- by 会员 amysarmy (2006/11/24 23:34:00)

liulu007

B选项我也在纠结于a greater number of products 这一点。当时做题读到这就给排除了，所以选错了。
看了大家的解释，为什么NN们能推出的not alter the number of products manufactured nor the waste generated from their use and discard是指产品的效率而不是数量呢？
刚开始我也选A，但A在看完OG答案后又看了遍原文给排除了，因为原文里没有说利润再投资会继续用于改进ecoefficiency上。不知道这么理解对不对。
还在纠结中。希望听听大家的意见。