ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 7404|回复: 11
打印 上一主题 下一主题

天山-9-3

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-12-16 23:49:00 | 只看该作者

天山-9-3

Business Consultant: Some corporations shun the use of executive titles because they
fear that the use of titles indicating position in the corporation tends to inhibit
communication up and down the corporate hierarchy
. Since an executive who uses a
title is treated with more respect by outsiders, however, use of a title can facilitate an
executive’s dealings with external businesses
. The obvious compromise is for these
executives to use their corporate titles externally but not internally, since even if it is
widely known that the corporation’s executives use executive titles outside their
organization, this knowledge does not by itself inhibit communication within the
corporation.
In the consultant’s reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following
roles?
A. The first presents an obstacle to achieving a certain goal; the second presents a
reason for considering that goal to be undesirable.
B. The first is a consideration that has led to the adoption of a certain strategy; the
second presents a reason against adopting that strategy.
C. The first describes a concern that the consultant dismisses as insignificant; the
second is a consideration that serves as the basis for that dismissal.
D. The first is a belief for which the consultant offers support; the second is part of
that support.
E. The first is a belief against which evidence is offered; the second is part of the
evidence offered against that belief.


MINE E


ANS B


请指教


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-12-17 1:53:51编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2004-12-17 01:07:00 | 只看该作者

我选B。最吻合题目思路,先说因为担心使用头衔影响上下级交流(consideration)而禁止使用头衔称呼(strategy),但是这样会影响与外部交往便利(reason against strategy), 最后提出一折中方案(solution没提到)。

E中的evidence 是没有在题中有体现的吧?

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-12-17 01:55:00 | 只看该作者

不好意思

刚才BOLDFACE没标出来

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2004-12-17 01:56:00 | 只看该作者
有道理
5#
发表于 2005-6-17 17:37:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得C倒是满贴切的,唉!大家好像都没考虑过C。我的思路大概有问题,难受。
6#
发表于 2005-11-13 11:29:00 | 只看该作者

The obvious compromise is for these executives to use their corporate titles externally but not internally


compromise 折衷、妥协


C中dismisses as insignificant完全错误

7#
发表于 2005-12-22 09:09:00 | 只看该作者

同意B.

8#
发表于 2005-12-22 13:18:00 | 只看该作者

支持B. 两者矛盾后妥协compromise, 问两者的作用,应该一个赞成,另一个反对是合乎原逻辑的表述.


C 我觉得主要是 insignificant,是个无关选项.

9#
发表于 2006-8-16 16:31:00 | 只看该作者

关于CONSIDERATION 是指需要考虑的事项, 这个词在这里非常符合BF1, 于是我锁定B.

而C中出现的CONSIDERATION与BF2不符, 排除.

10#
发表于 2007-10-15 22:38:00 | 只看该作者
回原文分析,为了不影响上下级交流所以不使用头衔,这更符合一个strategy而不是一个evidence.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-29 00:40
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部