ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Editorial:In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance. To reduce unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply. However, the supplement will not raise any worker's income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed. Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.

Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2681|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

????Q10:TTGWD11-Q30:

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-4-17 23:00:58 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
????Q10:TTGWD11-Q30:   C
Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance.  To reduce unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply.  However, the supplement will not raise any worker’s income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed.  Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.
Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?
A.    The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families.
B.    Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has.
C.    People who are employed and look for a new job tend to get higher-paying jobs than job seekers who are unemployed.
D.    The yearly amount unemployed people receive from government assistance is less than the yearly income that the government defines as the poverty level.
E.     People sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work.

题干中说“the supplement will not raise any worker’s income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed.”也就是给了有工作人supplement之后的income不超过给没工作人的assistance。。。是怎么个意思。那不就是说还不如不工作么??求解释啊!!!!!!!!!不能忍了。。。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2013-4-17 23:01:49 | 只看该作者
真的急死了。。。谁给我说说啊。。。
板凳
发表于 2013-4-18 10:07:55 | 只看该作者
the supplement will not raise any worker’s income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed.
政府会提供补助去补充薪水低于assistance的部分,但是不会超过assistance
所以对于这部分人来说,从financial上讲,工作不工作没有区别这是作者的观点

C选项从long term来讲,虽然短期没区别,但是长期的话增加工作经验还是可以让长期薪水提高,所以是削弱

Hope it helps

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2013-4-18 12:15:02 | 只看该作者
pharmacystar 发表于 2013-4-18 10:07
the supplement will not raise any worker’s income above what government assistance would provide if ...

哦原来是这样。也就是说现在虽然低,但是那些现在有工作的人以后可能会找到薪酬更多的工作,那就能超过assistance了?  谢谢。有点明白了。
5#
发表于 2013-4-18 13:31:48 | 只看该作者
长期对工人还是有利的
所以他们还是会选择被雇佣
虽然短期内工作不工作领得薪水都一样
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 21:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部