ChaseDream
搜索
123
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: carolyue
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD3-24

[复制链接]
21#
发表于 2007-7-15 12:07:00 | 只看该作者
这道题很莫名

说实话,我觉得D和E都不完全正确

PS。谁能保证GWD的题是完全正确的?????
22#
发表于 2007-11-26 08:48:00 | 只看该作者

Q24:

The passage cites all of the following as differences between firms using build strategies and firms using harvest strategies EXCEPT

  1. their willingness to sacrifice short-term profits in order to build market share
                
  2. their willingness to sacrifice building market share in order to increase short-term profitability
            
  3. the number of strategic options available to their managers
            
  4. the relative importance they assign to maximizing cash-flow
            
  5. how likely they are to employ decision-sharing in developing strategic plans

请问,AB有什么不同呀??

23#
发表于 2009-3-30 09:25:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得选B诶,不是说是EXCEPT?请NN指正啦~~

24#
发表于 2009-3-30 09:26:00 | 只看该作者
漏看了,B提到过了
25#
发表于 2010-6-5 14:12:26 | 只看该作者
同意E,理由有二

1.be affected by a firm’s strategic mission (its fundamental approach to increasing sales revenue and market share, and generating cash flow and short-term profits).  故此A,B,C在同一层面上;.”  Additionally....又加上了D,此选E理由之一

2.Conversely之后的内容是说在"build"策略的公司,individual leadership才可能导致adhere to plan(句中的may可以说明一点问题),换句话说decision sharing会导致deriviate from plan,但并没有说在这类公司采用decision sharing 的可能性就比较小.
26#
发表于 2010-8-9 22:59:10 | 只看该作者
同意E。

我觉得在

E.how likely they are to employ decision-sharing in developing strategic plans



中,两种Strategy(build & harvest)不是与公司应用DECISION-SHARING 在developing strategic plans有关,而是与公司应用DECISION-SHARING在adhere to plan的时候有关。在 harvest Strategy 时,公司容易就某一具体问题通过decision-sharing达成一致,来adhere to (harvest strategic)plan;而在build Strategy时,公司往往采用个人领导力,而不是decision-sharing来adhere to (build strategic)plan。换句话说,在 developing strategic plan时,decision-sharing的应用文中并没有提。develop strategic plan 和adhere to plan并不是一回事。



不是对否?请NN们斧正。
-- by 会员 tigerzheng (2005/10/11 17:50:00)




部分同意这个观点,但我的理解稍微有些区别。我觉得重点需要分析这个句子

Additionally, managers under harvest strategies may have fewer strategic options than do those under build strategies; it may therefore be easier to reach agreement on a particular course of action through decision-sharing, which will in turn tend to promote adherence to plans.Conversely, in a “build” strategy scenario, individual leadership, rather than decision-sharing, may promote adherence to plans.”

这句话说明
build型策略的公司和harvest型策略的公司都会employ decision-sharing,但是harvest型策略的公司采用decision-sharing时更容易reach agreement;而build型策略的公司用individual leadership更容易reach agreements,从而adhere to plans,注意这里只是文章提出这种模式,并没说build型策略的公司不采用decision-sharing。换句话说,文章并没提到到两种公司采用decision-sharing的可能性,只是提到到两种公司采用decision-sharing时对adherence to plans的效果。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-12-9 06:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部