ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: joe11
打印 上一主题 下一主题

天山-3-30

[复制链接]
51#
发表于 2005-3-28 02:34:00 | 只看该作者

I think I can close this case, following is an article about Mr. Blassingame. From the description about him, we can easily find out whether he studied others' WORK or he studied SLAVERY himself.

The article mentions that he did not study others' WORK but studied slavery directly.....

Historian John Blassingame,
pioneer in study of slavery, dies

John Blassingame, 59, a Yale historian renowned for his studies of slavery and former chair of the University's African American Studies Program, died Feb. 13 after a long illness.

A memorial service was held at the Divinity School's Marquand Chapel on Feb. 19.

Professor Blassingame's career advanced rapidly at Yale. He first joined the faculty in 1970 as a lecturer, and was made a tenured associate professor of history in 1973. A year later, he was promoted to full professorship.

Professor Blassingame was noted for his industrious scholarship. He published three books almost simultaneously: an edited book, "New Perspectives on Black Studies" (1971); "The Slave Community: Plantation Life in the Antebellum South" (1972); and "Black New Orleans, 1860-1880" (1973).

These books broke new ground in the emerging field of African American studies and were hailed by critics for replacing erroneous and highly stereotypical histories with rich, complex portraits of emerging African-American societies before and after the Civil War.

Professor Blassingame also became a major force in the recovery of the African-American documentary heritage. He assumed editorship of the "Papers of Frederick Douglass" in the mid-1970s and published six volumes of Douglass' papers and manuscripts between 1979 and 1999. He also pioneered the recovery of autobiographical materials by former slaves, which he collected in his massive and highly acclaimed collection "Slave Testimony: Two Centuries of Letters, Speeches, Interviews, and Autobiographies," published in 1977.

His Yale colleagues credit Professor Blassingame's mentorship with energizing scores of undergraduate and graduate students in his years at Yale, many of whom are now teaching in colleges and universities across the nation. He was an early member of Yale's then fledgling African American Studies Program, where he served as acting chair in 1971-72 and in 1976-77 and then as chair between 1981 and 1989. He held these posts while continuing an active affiliation with both the Department of History and the American Studies Program.

"John Blassingame's personal warmth and elegance of scholarship transformed African-American history and American history generally," said Jon Butler, chair of the history department. "His achievements at Yale and in the historical profession will live on in the vigor of his original scholarship, in the legacy of his pioneering documentary publishing, and in the strong focus on African-American history that for more than 30 years he brought to Yale's history department, the American Studies Program and the African American Studies Program."

Among Professor Blassingame's greatest scholarly contributions were his works that provide accounts of slaves' lives, says David Brion Davis, Sterling Professor of History.

"Beginning in 1970 he was one of the leading pioneers in the study of American slavery," Davis commented. "His books, such as 'The Slave Community' and 'Slave Testimony,' were among the first works to provide us with the perspective of slaves themselves. For the latter work, Professor Blassingame collected an unparalleled assortment of slave letters, interviews and other materials that convey what it really meant to be a slave.

"Professor Blassingame also launched the Frederick Douglass Papers project, illuminating the life of the most important and influential African American of the 19th century," Davis adds.

Mr. Blassingame was born in Covington, Georgia, in 1940. He received his B.A. at Fort Valley State College in 1960, an M.A. at Howard University in 1961, and his Ph.D. at Yale in 1971. He served as an instructor at Howard University from 1961 to 1965 and then was an associate at the Carnegie-Mellon Foundation until he began his doctoral studies at Yale.

Professor Blassingame is survived by his wife, Teasie; a daughter, Tia; a son, John; and his father, Grady Blassingame. Memorial contributions may be made to the Fort Valley State University Foundation, 1005 State University Drive, Fort Valley, GA 31030.

52#
发表于 2005-3-28 15:51:00 | 只看该作者

我倾向于D。



我的原因如下:



1、D的study和work比较,意思合理。而A中that只能代study,而不能代records。逻辑意思为人B对于奴隶的研究与早期的奴隶著作的研究相比较,是不合理的。即使划线后说rely on records... 是指研究奴隶所使用的的方法,而非研究对象是关于奴隶的著作。



2、这里的works不能指代records,因为除了第一点原因外,奴隶自己的记录不能说是works on slavery,因为works与records是不一样的,works一般除了引用records外还包括了作者的研究成果和观点。



3、即使that代study,study of earlier works 单复数也有问题。


4、study在某种程度上和work类似。


请指教


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-3-28 15:55:12编辑过]
53#
发表于 2005-4-8 16:44:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用laoyv在2005-3-28 2:34:00的发言:

I think I can close this case, following is an article about Mr. Blassingame. From the description about him, we can easily find out whether he studied others' WORK or he studied SLAVERY himself.


The article mentions that he did not study others' WORK but studied slavery directly.....




两码事吧?按照这句话,岂不是WORK和SLAVERY对应。我还是于D。天大地大,意思最大嘛!

54#
发表于 2005-4-15 15:47:00 | 只看该作者

支持D。如果把earlier works和一个人Blassingame对比,觉得很荒谬。

55#
发表于 2005-4-16 01:25:00 | 只看该作者

In my opinion, I support the view of A,respectively, because the supreme principle of

OG - parallelism- should be followed.

56#
发表于 2005-4-20 21:25:00 | 只看该作者


支持a


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-4-20 21:27:56编辑过]
57#
发表于 2005-4-25 21:16:00 | 只看该作者
同意选a,that指代study, works与records平行
58#
发表于 2005-4-28 10:09:00 | 只看该作者

definitely support D.

59#
发表于 2005-5-2 21:14:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用scorpio0001在2005-3-28 15:51:00的发言:

我倾向于D。




我的原因如下:



1、D的study和work比较,意思合理。而A中that只能代study,而不能代records。逻辑意思为人B对于奴隶的研究与早期的奴隶著作的研究相比较,是不合理的。即使划线后说rely on records... 是指研究奴隶所使用的的方法,而非研究对象是关于奴隶的著作。



2、这里的works不能指代records,因为除了第一点原因外,奴隶自己的记录不能说是works on slavery,因为works与records是不一样的,works一般除了引用records外还包括了作者的研究成果和观点。



3、即使that代study,study of earlier works 单复数也有问题。


--study 可以作为整体的研究,即对以前所有关于奴隶制度的著作的研究(但明显不是表达研究以前著作的意思)


4、study在某种程度上和work类似。


请指教





除第三点外,其余均同意scorpio0001 MM!


从未划线部分可以得知:B教授对于奴隶制度的研究及著作的资料来源不是奴隶主,而是奴隶们自身的记录。由此可以推知unlike后面的比较对象是:早期对于奴隶制度的研究及著作,而不是对于奴隶制度的研究/著作的研究


PS:works 是著作,study可以同时表示研究以及著作,两者概念相等。


选D没商量!

60#
发表于 2005-5-2 22:03:00 | 只看该作者

Unlike that of earlier works on slavery, Blassingame’s innovative study relies not on the records of White slave owners but on the records of the salves themselves, especially the 70 or so autobiographies and memoirs that have been preserved.


A. that of earlier works on slavery, Blassingame’s


D. earlier works on slavery, Blassingame’s


看大家争论的惹火朝天,我也说两句.我选D.


1.说works和records平行就太错了,like/unlike只能比较主语,怎么会分身术,一半去比较主语,一半去和宾语去比了?


2.说A更平行也错了,我就看不出A比D更平行的地方来.


3.还有哥们说study是研究别人的works的,而不是研究slavery本身.我想起码在句子里不能体会到这点,如果按常理,更不会是这样.除非ETS就是玩弄大家.:-((


works既然和study意义相同/相近,我想没有理由要加个that在那边多事.最关键的一点在于那个earlier!!!大家有没有注意到?


这个earlier一定是修饰like后面的名词主体的,这样才能在句中形成强对比!--也就是:和以前的XXX不同, 某牛人的XXX................所以加上that的话,earlier就置后了,也就不能形成强对比.这才是GWD提倡的从句意看题目(但是仿佛他并不是这么做的)


just my $2%


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-5-2 22:06:19编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-21 00:08
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部