LAST-3-4-17

cicilla

Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstrated that his theory about the determinants of rat behavior generates consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze On the basis of this evidence; Dr. Ladlow has claimed that his theory is irrefutably correct. Anson: Then Dr. ladlow is not responsible psychologist. Dr. ladlow’s evidence does not conclusively prove that his theory is correct. Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect.

17. Which one of the following can be properly inferred from Anson’s argument?

(A) Dr. Ladlow’s evidence that his theory generates consistently accurate predictions about how rates will perform in a maze is inaccurate

(B) Psychologists who can derive consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze from their theories cannot responsibly conclude that those theories cannot be disproved

(C) No matter how responsible psychologists are, they can never develop correct theoretical explanations.

(D) Responsible psychologists do not make predictions about how rats will perform in a maze

(E) Psychologists who accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect are responsible psychologists.

The Key is B, Why is E wrong?

chelseayang

Anson: psychologists who are responsible accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect

E is a mistaken reversal

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-12-6 9:22:05编辑过]

cicilla

I think E is the same meaning as Anson's words. I'm confused.

chelseayang

Arson: psychologyists who are responsible, accept X

E): psychologists who accept X, are responsible

It is confusing

When you get confused, try to paraphrase the sentence into a simpler form. that is what i usually do and it works, hehe

xjlv128