ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1890|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

last-4-3-4

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-12-6 08:00:00 | 只看该作者

last-4-3-4

4.     In stating the argument, the author does which one of the following?


(A) makes a detailed statistical projection of future topsoil loss


(B) makes a generalization about total reduction in topsoil depth in all states


(C) assumes that the United States government does not place a high value on its natural resources


(D) refrains from using slanted language concerning the level of federal expendituresE


(E) compares state expenditures with federal expenditures


好像整个句子 makes a generalization about total reduction in topsoil depth in all states 的情况比较多吧.比如: In the United States, each bushel of corn produced might result in the loss of as much as two bushels of topsoil. Moreover, in the last 100 years, the topsoil in many states, which once was about fourteen inches thick, has been eroded to only six or eight inches.


)compares state expenditures with federal expenditures 只是最后一句提到的啊


为什么不选B ?

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2004-12-6 08:02:00 | 只看该作者

sorry , forgot the text.

The United States government generally tries to protect valuable natural resources. But one resource has been ignored for too long. In the United States, each bushel of corn produced might result in the loss of as much as two bushels of topsoil. Moreover, in the last 100 years, the topsoil in many states, which once was about fourteen inches thick, has been eroded to only six or eight inches. Nonetheless, federal expenditures for nationwide soil conservation programs have remained at ridiculously low levels. Total federal expenditures for nationwide soil conservation programs have been less than the allocations of some individual states.

板凳
发表于 2004-12-9 11:43:00 | 只看该作者

NN,pls let us know the reason.

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2004-12-10 07:07:00 | 只看该作者

I understand it. thanks !

5#
发表于 2005-8-9 18:15:00 | 只看该作者
我也有类似疑问,好象D更贯穿全文,盼望大N给解释一下。
6#
发表于 2006-3-26 15:38:00 | 只看该作者

还没人回答么?我也奇怪D……

7#
发表于 2006-3-31 00:28:00 | 只看该作者

Because there has been a great plunge in the depth of top soil in many states.


And the federal government has put less money in soil conservation than some individul states have.


So, soil has not been regarded as a valuable natural resource by the federal gov.


Where is the generalisation?

8#
发表于 2006-4-9 17:14:00 | 只看该作者
那D呢?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-11 21:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部