gwd-9-19

河西学校

GWD-9-Q19:
                虚拟语气/ 主谓一致 / 代词指代

In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in the United Stated today, a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted within the scope of his or her authority and if the corporation benefited as a result.

A.    a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted

B.    a corporation is committing a crime whenever one of its employees committed a crime, if those employees were acting

C.    corporations commit a crime whenever one of its employees does, on the condition that the employee acts

D.    corporations commit crimes whenever an employee of those corporations commit a crime, if it was while acting

E.     the corporation whose employees commit a crime, commits a crime, whenever the employee acted

 

自我分析：

注意原题里没划线的部分有 and if，暗示句子有并列关系，if后面用的过去时态，那and前面应该也是过去时态。

B，were acting与后面没划线的and if后时态不同，错；

C，corporations与后面的its代词指代不一致，acts
        与后面的benefited时态不平行；that错；

D，an employee与commit
        主谓不一致，it 代词无指代对象；

E，用whose employees commit a crime
        成了限定corporation，特指该类企业了（员工犯了罪的企业）犯罪了，逻辑意思改变。

原文想说的是：在某种情况下，如果一个公司的职员犯罪了，那该公司也算犯罪了。因此E错。

 

Brilliance

.

kevin512813

关键词“虚拟语气”
至今无人解释 感叹！

gracefighting

我觉得E后面的那个whenever不对吧。OG上面好像也有出过一题，whenver发生的可能性比if大~~~