ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: jerryyang
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[原创]With在og中的用法总结

[精华] [复制链接]
31#
发表于 2007-8-14 13:48:00 | 只看该作者
up
32#
发表于 2007-10-26 15:51:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用llxx1985cn在2007-8-14 11:03:00的发言:

弱问一下:with引导独立主格和with引导介词短语在形式上有什么区别?

同问???大牛帮着解答一下

33#
发表于 2007-12-2 20:51:00 | 只看该作者

同问

34#
发表于 2008-3-16 23:47:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用specialcognac在2007-4-10 11:30:00的发言:

个人认为jerrryguan和davidcooper说的应该是正确的,兄弟的这两个例子并不是例外,因为这两个with在这里都是独立主格,而不是介词短语;with介词短语放在句末不是好选项,应该这个可以作为GMAT的一条判断原则吧

这两个例子都是独立主格结构放在句末,表示解释说明;

35#
发表于 2008-3-16 23:50:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用davidcopper在2004-11-27 20:43:00的发言:

 很少有独立的介词短语在句末的(不管前面是否加逗号)

这只是我目前观察的, 如果大家有发现介词短语在主谓宾句末作正确答案的, 请指正.

果然如此......

36#
发表于 2008-10-17 10:42:00 | 只看该作者

这个帖子真牛~~~

37#
发表于 2009-1-10 09:16:00 | 只看该作者
大全985答案应该是A
38#
发表于 2009-1-12 10:30:00 | 只看该作者

Up!

39#
发表于 2009-2-28 04:09:00 | 只看该作者

高,实在是高!又搞定一个问题点

40#
发表于 2009-8-6 15:15:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用JerryGuan在2004/11/30 13:59:00的发言:

很少有独立的介词短语在句末的(不管前面是否加逗号)

不是很少,就是没有,嘿嘿

152. When the technique known as gene-splicing was invented in the early 1970's, it was feared that scien­tists might inadvertently create an "Andromeda strain," a microbe never before seen on Earth that might escape from the laboratory and it would kill vast numbers of humans who would have no natural defenses against it.

(A)  it would kill vast numbers of humans who would have no natural defenses against it

(B)   it might kill vast numbers of humans with no natural defenses against it

(C)  kill vast numbers of humans who would have no natural defenses against it(虚拟语气没有错)

(D)  kill vast numbers of humans who have no natu­ral defenses against them

(E)   kill vast numbers of humans with no natural
                defenses against them

This sentence requires parallel verb forms within the relative clause that might escape... and kill. C, the best choice, uses parallel verb forms that are followed appropriately by the conditional would have in the who clause that modifies humans. Choices A and B each violate parallel construction by intro­ducing a new independent clause, it would kill... and it might kill... Though choices D and E begin by observing parallel­ism, the use of them at the end of each creates a problem of pronoun reference: them cannot refer to the singular microbe.
                            
In addition, choices B, D, and E lack would and thus do not express the conditional.

 

 

 

E选项,OG 没说with- 在句末修饰宾语 不可啊?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-23 18:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部